Evaluate Clinical Effects of Denture Restoration and Dental Implant Restoration in Common Symptom in Clinical Dental Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Evaluate Clinical Effects of Denture Restoration and Dental Implant Restoration in Common Symptom in Clinical Dental Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Authors:	Keshtkar, Amir Arsalan¹, Bafandeh, Mohammad Amin² Amin.bafandeh@gmail.com, Sabet, Maryam³, Nouri, Farzad¹
Source:	Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 2021, Vol. 12 Issue 10, p5456-5464. 9p.
Subject Terms:	*Age groups, Dental implants, Dental fillings, Dentures, Overlay dentures, Odds ratio, Data extraction
Abstract:	Background and aim:The researcher in the present study sought to provide stronger evidence in this regard; therefore the present study was conducted to evaluate clinical effects of denture restoration and dental implant restoration in common symptom in clinical dental patients. Method:Databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO and Embase were searched for systematic literature between 2016 to August 2021. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) used to assess quality of the cohort studies. For Data extraction, two reviewers blind and independently extracted data from abstract and full text of studies that included.95% confidence interval for odds ratio and mean differences withfixed effect model and in-variance method were calculated. To deal with potential heterogeneity, random effects were used and I2 showed heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata/MP v.16 software (The fastest version of Stata). Result:In the initial review, duplicate studies were eliminated and abstracts of 485 studies were reviewed, the full text of 104 studies was reviewed by two authors, finally, eleven studies were selected. Odds ratio of dentition defect between intervention and control groupwas 5.93 (OR, 5.93 95% CI 1.87, 10.00). Mean differences of Retention function score between two groups was 1.39 (MD, 1.39 95% CI 1.21, 1.56). Conclusion: Based on the findings of the present study, the use of dental implant restoration, especially in the age group of less than 60 years, is more effective than denture restoration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry is the property of Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Background and aim:The researcher in the present study sought to provide stronger evidence in this regard; therefore the present study was conducted to evaluate clinical effects of denture restoration and dental implant restoration in common symptom in clinical dental patients. Method:Databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO and Embase were searched for systematic literature between 2016 to August 2021. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) used to assess quality of the cohort studies. For Data extraction, two reviewers blind and independently extracted data from abstract and full text of studies that included.95% confidence interval for odds ratio and mean differences withfixed effect model and in-variance method were calculated. To deal with potential heterogeneity, random effects were used and I2 showed heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata/MP v.16 software (The fastest version of Stata). Result:In the initial review, duplicate studies were eliminated and abstracts of 485 studies were reviewed, the full text of 104 studies was reviewed by two authors, finally, eleven studies were selected. Odds ratio of dentition defect between intervention and control groupwas 5.93 (OR, 5.93 95% CI 1.87, 10.00). Mean differences of Retention function score between two groups was 1.39 (MD, 1.39 95% CI 1.21, 1.56). Conclusion: Based on the findings of the present study, the use of dental implant restoration, especially in the age group of less than 60 years, is more effective than denture restoration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	13096591