The 'Court of Public Opinion:' Public Perceptions of Business Involvement in Human Rights Violations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The 'Court of Public Opinion:' Public Perceptions of Business Involvement in Human Rights Violations.
Authors: Amengual, Matthew1 (AUTHOR) matthew.amengual@sbs.ox.ac.uk, Mota, Rita2 (AUTHOR), Rustler, Alexander1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Business Ethics. Jun2023, Vol. 185 Issue 1, p49-74. 26p. 9 Charts, 5 Graphs.
Subject Terms: Human rights violations, Business ethics, Public opinion, International business enterprises, Due diligence
Abstract: Public pressure is essential for providing multinational enterprises (MNEs) with motivation to follow the standards of human rights conduct set in soft-law instruments, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. But how does the public judge MNE involvement in human rights violations? We empirically answer this question drawing on an original survey of American adults. We asked respondents to judge over 12,000 randomly generated scenarios in which MNEs may be considered to have been involved in human rights violations. Our findings reveal substantial gaps between public judgments and the standards set in soft law and the normative literature. We identify the attributes of episodes of human rights violations involving MNEs that influence public judgments, including the relationship between the MNE and the perpetrator, the practice of due diligence, and the type of abuse. These results provide insights as to when we might expect public pressure to drive MNE compliance with soft-law instruments, and they direct attention to specific standards that will likely require stronger, 'hard' law approaches or broader efforts to shift the public's view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 163885943
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The 'Court of Public Opinion:' Public Perceptions of Business Involvement in Human Rights Violations.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Amengual%2C+Matthew%22">Amengual, Matthew</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> matthew.amengual@sbs.ox.ac.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mota%2C+Rita%22">Mota, Rita</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rustler%2C+Alexander%22">Rustler, Alexander</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Business+Ethics%22">Journal of Business Ethics</searchLink>. Jun2023, Vol. 185 Issue 1, p49-74. 26p. 9 Charts, 5 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+rights+violations%22">Human rights violations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Business+ethics%22">Business ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+opinion%22">Public opinion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+business+enterprises%22">International business enterprises</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Due+diligence%22">Due diligence</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Public pressure is essential for providing multinational enterprises (MNEs) with motivation to follow the standards of human rights conduct set in soft-law instruments, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. But how does the public judge MNE involvement in human rights violations? We empirically answer this question drawing on an original survey of American adults. We asked respondents to judge over 12,000 randomly generated scenarios in which MNEs may be considered to have been involved in human rights violations. Our findings reveal substantial gaps between public judgments and the standards set in soft law and the normative literature. We identify the attributes of episodes of human rights violations involving MNEs that influence public judgments, including the relationship between the MNE and the perpetrator, the practice of due diligence, and the type of abuse. These results provide insights as to when we might expect public pressure to drive MNE compliance with soft-law instruments, and they direct attention to specific standards that will likely require stronger, 'hard' law approaches or broader efforts to shift the public's view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=163885943
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10551-022-05147-5
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
        StartPage: 49
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Human rights violations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Business ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public opinion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: International business enterprises
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Due diligence
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The 'Court of Public Opinion:' Public Perceptions of Business Involvement in Human Rights Violations.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Amengual, Matthew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mota, Rita
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rustler, Alexander
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01674544
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 185
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Business Ethics
              Type: main
ResultId 1