Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing.
Authors: Klein, Perry D.1 pklein@uwo.ca
Source: Instructional Science. May2004, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p191-231. 41p.
Subject Terms: *Communication, *Problem solving, *College students, *Factor analysis, Writing, Regression analysis
Abstract: This study examined the writing strategies and text characteristics associated with discovering a scientific principle by writing about an experiment. Sixty-four university students (non-science majors) carried out a physics experiment concerning either buoyancy, or the forces acting on a balance scale, then wrote an informal journal-style note about it while thinking-aloud. They provided explanations of the phenomena before experimenting, immediately after experimenting (before writing), and again after writing about the experiment. Students' verbal protocols were segmented and writing operations were identified; the rhetorical structures of their texts were analyzed; and each students' level of general writing strategy was identified. A factor analysis showed that six components accounted for 76% of the variance in these measures. Logistic regression analysis showed that type of science experiment and two writing factors, ``Problem Solving'' and ``Comparisons in Text,'' discriminated 86% of cases in which students made explanatory gains during the writing interval. The results generally exemplified a metacognitive, problem solving model of writing to learn. However, in contrast to dominant metacognitive models, setting content goals, applying moderately sophisticated writing strategies, and extensive use of content sources were important for learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Instructional Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 16980197
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klein%2C+Perry+D%2E%22">Klein, Perry D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> pklein@uwo.ca</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Instructional+Science%22">Instructional Science</searchLink>. May2004, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p191-231. 41p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+solving%22">Problem solving</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing%22">Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study examined the writing strategies and text characteristics associated with discovering a scientific principle by writing about an experiment. Sixty-four university students (non-science majors) carried out a physics experiment concerning either buoyancy, or the forces acting on a balance scale, then wrote an informal journal-style note about it while thinking-aloud. They provided explanations of the phenomena before experimenting, immediately after experimenting (before writing), and again after writing about the experiment. Students' verbal protocols were segmented and writing operations were identified; the rhetorical structures of their texts were analyzed; and each students' level of general writing strategy was identified. A factor analysis showed that six components accounted for 76% of the variance in these measures. Logistic regression analysis showed that type of science experiment and two writing factors, ``Problem Solving'' and ``Comparisons in Text,'' discriminated 86% of cases in which students made explanatory gains during the writing interval. The results generally exemplified a metacognitive, problem solving model of writing to learn. However, in contrast to dominant metacognitive models, setting content goals, applying moderately sophisticated writing strategies, and extensive use of content sources were important for learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Instructional Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=16980197
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024189.74263.bd
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 41
        StartPage: 191
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Problem solving
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regression analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Klein, Perry D.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2004
              Type: published
              Y: 2004
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00204277
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 32
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Instructional Science
              Type: main
ResultId 1