Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing.
Saved in:
| Title: | Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Klein, Perry D.1 pklein@uwo.ca |
| Source: | Instructional Science. May2004, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p191-231. 41p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Communication, *Problem solving, *College students, *Factor analysis, Writing, Regression analysis |
| Abstract: | This study examined the writing strategies and text characteristics associated with discovering a scientific principle by writing about an experiment. Sixty-four university students (non-science majors) carried out a physics experiment concerning either buoyancy, or the forces acting on a balance scale, then wrote an informal journal-style note about it while thinking-aloud. They provided explanations of the phenomena before experimenting, immediately after experimenting (before writing), and again after writing about the experiment. Students' verbal protocols were segmented and writing operations were identified; the rhetorical structures of their texts were analyzed; and each students' level of general writing strategy was identified. A factor analysis showed that six components accounted for 76% of the variance in these measures. Logistic regression analysis showed that type of science experiment and two writing factors, ``Problem Solving'' and ``Comparisons in Text,'' discriminated 86% of cases in which students made explanatory gains during the writing interval. The results generally exemplified a metacognitive, problem solving model of writing to learn. However, in contrast to dominant metacognitive models, setting content goals, applying moderately sophisticated writing strategies, and extensive use of content sources were important for learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Instructional Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 16980197 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klein%2C+Perry+D%2E%22">Klein, Perry D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> pklein@uwo.ca</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Instructional+Science%22">Instructional Science</searchLink>. May2004, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p191-231. 41p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+solving%22">Problem solving</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing%22">Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examined the writing strategies and text characteristics associated with discovering a scientific principle by writing about an experiment. Sixty-four university students (non-science majors) carried out a physics experiment concerning either buoyancy, or the forces acting on a balance scale, then wrote an informal journal-style note about it while thinking-aloud. They provided explanations of the phenomena before experimenting, immediately after experimenting (before writing), and again after writing about the experiment. Students' verbal protocols were segmented and writing operations were identified; the rhetorical structures of their texts were analyzed; and each students' level of general writing strategy was identified. A factor analysis showed that six components accounted for 76% of the variance in these measures. Logistic regression analysis showed that type of science experiment and two writing factors, ``Problem Solving'' and ``Comparisons in Text,'' discriminated 86% of cases in which students made explanatory gains during the writing interval. The results generally exemplified a metacognitive, problem solving model of writing to learn. However, in contrast to dominant metacognitive models, setting content goals, applying moderately sophisticated writing strategies, and extensive use of content sources were important for learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Instructional Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=16980197 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024189.74263.bd Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 41 StartPage: 191 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem solving Type: general – SubjectFull: College students Type: general – SubjectFull: Factor analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Klein, Perry D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2004 Type: published Y: 2004 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00204277 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 32 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Instructional Science Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |