Relating Acoustic Measures to Listener Ratings of Children's Productions of Word-Initial /r/ and /w/.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Relating Acoustic Measures to Listener Ratings of Children's Productions of Word-Initial /r/ and /w/.
Authors:	Ancel, Elizabeth E.¹ Ancel104@umn.edu, Smith, Michael L.¹, Rao, V. N. Vimal², Munson, Benjamin¹
Source:	Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Sep2023, Vol. 66 Issue 9, p3413-3427. 15p. 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 6 Graphs.
Subject Terms:	Speech evaluation, Articulation disorders, Statistical correlation, Evaluation, Reliability (Personality trait), Relative medical risk, Physiological aspects of speech, Auditory perception in children, Human voice, Visual analog scale, Research funding, Descriptive statistics, Hypothesis, Sound
Abstract:	Purpose: The /r/ productions of young children acquiring American English are highly variable and often inaccurate, with [w] as the most common substitution error. One acoustic indicator of the goodness of children's /r/ productions is the difference between the frequency of the second formant (F2) and the third formant (F3), with a smaller F3-F2 difference being associated with a perceptually more adultlike /r/. This study analyzed the effectiveness of automatically extracted F3-F2 differences in characterizing young children's productions of /r/--/w/ in comparison with manually coded measurements. Method: Automated F3-F2 differences were extracted from productions of a variety of different /r/- and /w/-initial words spoken by 3- to 4-year-old monolingual preschoolers (N = 117; 2,278 tokens in total). These automated measures were compared to ratings of the phoneme goodness of children's productions as rated by untrained adult listeners (n = 132) on a visual analog scale, as well as to narrow transcriptions of the production into four categories: [r], [w], and two intermediate categories. Results: Data visualizations show a weak relationship between automated F3-F2 differences with listener ratings and narrow transcriptions. Mixed-effects models suggest the automated F3-F2 difference only modestly predicts listener ratings (R² = .37) and narrow transcriptions (R² = .32). Conclusion: The weak relationship between automated F3-F2 difference and both listener ratings and narrow transcriptions suggests that these automated acoustic measures are of questionable reliability and utility in assessing preschool children's mastery of the /r/--/w/ contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Purpose: The /r/ productions of young children acquiring American English are highly variable and often inaccurate, with [w] as the most common substitution error. One acoustic indicator of the goodness of children's /r/ productions is the difference between the frequency of the second formant (F2) and the third formant (F3), with a smaller F3-F2 difference being associated with a perceptually more adultlike /r/. This study analyzed the effectiveness of automatically extracted F3-F2 differences in characterizing young children's productions of /r/--/w/ in comparison with manually coded measurements. Method: Automated F3-F2 differences were extracted from productions of a variety of different /r/- and /w/-initial words spoken by 3- to 4-year-old monolingual preschoolers (N = 117; 2,278 tokens in total). These automated measures were compared to ratings of the phoneme goodness of children's productions as rated by untrained adult listeners (n = 132) on a visual analog scale, as well as to narrow transcriptions of the production into four categories: [r], [w], and two intermediate categories. Results: Data visualizations show a weak relationship between automated F3-F2 differences with listener ratings and narrow transcriptions. Mixed-effects models suggest the automated F3-F2 difference only modestly predicts listener ratings (R² = .37) and narrow transcriptions (R² = .32). Conclusion: The weak relationship between automated F3-F2 difference and both listener ratings and narrow transcriptions suggests that these automated acoustic measures are of questionable reliability and utility in assessing preschool children's mastery of the /r/--/w/ contrast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	10924388
DOI:	10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00713