View in EDS

Safe Science: Material and Social Order in Laboratory Work.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Safe Science: Material and Social Order in Laboratory Work.
Authors: Sims, Benjamin
Source: Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.). Jun2005, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p333-366. 34p.
Subject Terms: *Laboratories, Science, Safety, Epistemics, Social order, Division of labor
Abstract: Scientific laboratories can sometimes be dangerous places to work, and safety concerns can have a significant impact on the scientific research process. Because safety practices specify both behavioral norms and technical standards, they provide an opportunity to better understand the relationships between the organizational and epistemic aspects of scientific culture. This paper presents a case study of a `pulsed-power' facility at the US Los Alamos National Laboratory, where electrical hazards are a major concern. Drawing on work by Mary Douglas and others, I show how safety in the pulsed-power laboratory can be understood in terms of concepts of order and pollution. In particular, I argue that the laboratory is a cultural setting that generates both material and social order in science. The concept of `traceability' - the ideal of being able to trace visual and logical connections between system components - is the central metaphor for material order in this setting. This metaphor is enacted in the design of pulsed-power systems and through various safety procedures that function as rituals. These rituals, and the concept of traceability itself, also contribute to social order by helping to shape norms of conduct in the laboratory, which in turn structure relationships between the laboratory work group and the larger institution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.) is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 17360103
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Safe Science: Material and Social Order in Laboratory Work.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sims%2C+Benjamin%22">Sims, Benjamin</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Social+Studies+of+Science+%28Sage+Publications%2C+Ltd%2E%29%22">Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.)</searchLink>. Jun2005, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p333-366. 34p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Laboratories%22">Laboratories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science%22">Science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Safety%22">Safety</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemics%22">Epistemics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+order%22">Social order</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Division+of+labor%22">Division of labor</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Scientific laboratories can sometimes be dangerous places to work, and safety concerns can have a significant impact on the scientific research process. Because safety practices specify both behavioral norms and technical standards, they provide an opportunity to better understand the relationships between the organizational and epistemic aspects of scientific culture. This paper presents a case study of a `pulsed-power' facility at the US Los Alamos National Laboratory, where electrical hazards are a major concern. Drawing on work by Mary Douglas and others, I show how safety in the pulsed-power laboratory can be understood in terms of concepts of order and pollution. In particular, I argue that the laboratory is a cultural setting that generates both material and social order in science. The concept of `traceability' - the ideal of being able to trace visual and logical connections between system components - is the central metaphor for material order in this setting. This metaphor is enacted in the design of pulsed-power systems and through various safety procedures that function as rituals. These rituals, and the concept of traceability itself, also contribute to social order by helping to shape norms of conduct in the laboratory, which in turn structure relationships between the laboratory work group and the larger institution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.) is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=17360103
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/0306312705052362
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 34
        StartPage: 333
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Laboratories
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Safety
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epistemics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social order
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Division of labor
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Safe Science: Material and Social Order in Laboratory Work.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sims, Benjamin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2005
              Type: published
              Y: 2005
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03063127
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Social Studies of Science (Sage Publications, Ltd.)
              Type: main
ResultId 1