Why Do You Still Use Dewey?
Saved in:
| Title: | Why Do You Still Use Dewey? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Shorten, Jay1 jshorten@ou.edu, Seikel, Michele2 seikelm@okstate.edu, Ahrberg, Janet H.2 jahrber@okstate.edu |
| Source: | Library Resources & Technical Services. Apr2005, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p123-136. 14p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Academic libraries, *Library users, *Dewey decimal classification, *Library of Congress classification, Library reclassification, Libraries & state |
| Geographic Terms: | United States, Canada |
| Abstract: | Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Library Resources & Technical Services is the property of American Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 17561311 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Why Do You Still Use Dewey? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shorten%2C+Jay%22">Shorten, Jay</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> jshorten@ou.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Seikel%2C+Michele%22">Seikel, Michele</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> seikelm@okstate.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ahrberg%2C+Janet+H%2E%22">Ahrberg, Janet H.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> jahrber@okstate.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Library+Resources+%26+Technical+Services%22">Library Resources & Technical Services</searchLink>. Apr2005, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p123-136. 14p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+libraries%22">Academic libraries</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+users%22">Library users</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dewey+decimal+classification%22">Dewey decimal classification</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+of+Congress+classification%22">Library of Congress classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+reclassification%22">Library reclassification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Libraries+%26+state%22">Libraries & state</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Library Resources & Technical Services is the property of American Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=17561311 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.5860/lrts.49n2.123 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 123 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Academic libraries Type: general – SubjectFull: Library users Type: general – SubjectFull: Dewey decimal classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Library of Congress classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Library reclassification Type: general – SubjectFull: Libraries & state Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general – SubjectFull: Canada Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Why Do You Still Use Dewey? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shorten, Jay – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Seikel, Michele – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ahrberg, Janet H. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2005 Type: published Y: 2005 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00242527 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 49 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Library Resources & Technical Services Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |