View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Feedback levels and their interaction with the mathematical reasoning process.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Feedback levels and their interaction with the mathematical reasoning process.
Authors: Smit, Robbert1 robbert.smit@phsg.ch, Bachmann, Patricia1, Dober, Heidi2, Hess, Kurt2
Source: Curriculum Journal. Jun2024, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p184-202. 19p.
Subject Terms: *Mathematics education, *Mathematical ability, *Reasoning, *Primary schools, *Learning
Abstract: In our multi‐method study, feedback levels derived from the well‐known feedback model of Hattie and Timperley were used in conjunction with feedback that was related to subject‐specific content; here, mathematical reasoning tasks in primary school. Feedback needs to be aligned with the learning process; in the beginning, more task feedback is valuable. Based on the analyses of videos and questionnaires of 44 teachers of 5th‐ and 6th‐grade primary school classes (N = 804), we demonstrated that feedback for finding an approach and operationalisation were related to feedback on the task. We further showed that feedback at the task level predicted students' achievement in mathematical reasoning via students' interest in mathematics. It might be concluded that the four levels of feedback should be applied by teachers in such a way that they focus on the current problem that is occurring while the student is solving a task. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Curriculum Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 176496353
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Feedback levels and their interaction with the mathematical reasoning process.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smit%2C+Robbert%22">Smit, Robbert</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> robbert.smit@phsg.ch</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bachmann%2C+Patricia%22">Bachmann, Patricia</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dober%2C+Heidi%22">Dober, Heidi</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hess%2C+Kurt%22">Hess, Kurt</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Curriculum+Journal%22">Curriculum Journal</searchLink>. Jun2024, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p184-202. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+education%22">Mathematics education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+ability%22">Mathematical ability</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reasoning%22">Reasoning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Primary+schools%22">Primary schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning%22">Learning</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In our multi‐method study, feedback levels derived from the well‐known feedback model of Hattie and Timperley were used in conjunction with feedback that was related to subject‐specific content; here, mathematical reasoning tasks in primary school. Feedback needs to be aligned with the learning process; in the beginning, more task feedback is valuable. Based on the analyses of videos and questionnaires of 44 teachers of 5th‐ and 6th‐grade primary school classes (N = 804), we demonstrated that feedback for finding an approach and operationalisation were related to feedback on the task. We further showed that feedback at the task level predicted students' achievement in mathematical reasoning via students' interest in mathematics. It might be concluded that the four levels of feedback should be applied by teachers in such a way that they focus on the current problem that is occurring while the student is solving a task. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Curriculum Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=176496353
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/curj.221
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 184
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reasoning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Primary schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Feedback levels and their interaction with the mathematical reasoning process.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Smit, Robbert
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bachmann, Patricia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dober, Heidi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hess, Kurt
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09585176
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Curriculum Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1