Gender quotas are not enough: the need for multiple strategies to address gender equity in Australian universities.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Gender quotas are not enough: the need for multiple strategies to address gender equity in Australian universities.
Authors: Crimmins, Gail1 gcrimmin@usc.edu.au, Marshall, Elvessa2, Read, Gemma J.M.3,4
Source: Gender & Education. Aug2024, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p581-598. 18p.
Subject Terms: *Methodology, *Discourse analysis, Political quotas, Neoliberalism
Geographic Terms: Australia
Abstract: The paper examines a 'circulatory' system of gender inequity in Australian universities where gender bias prevents women from accessing senior decision-making roles and stultifies their capacity to act as gender change agents. It has been mooted that equity quotas for senior roles can derail this circuit of male privilege in academia. Yet a plastic reading of the shape of gender equity policy and practice in Australian universities over the last 40 years reveals an increasing acceptance of individualism, which positions women's liberation as being achievable through self-responsibilisation. If these discourses remain unchallenged, gender quotas for senior roles alone will likely only benefit those entrepreneurial women admitted to senior positions, rendering the causes of gender inequity hidden and exonerated. Using a novel methodology that combines a 'plastic' with a complex systems lens of policy manoeuvres, we suggest gender quotas, accompanied by strategy designed to develop leaders' gender competency and change agency, are required to support more sustainably equitable work structure within the academy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Gender & Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 178440451
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Gender quotas are not enough: the need for multiple strategies to address gender equity in Australian universities.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crimmins%2C+Gail%22">Crimmins, Gail</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> gcrimmin@usc.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marshall%2C+Elvessa%22">Marshall, Elvessa</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Read%2C+Gemma+J%2EM%2E%22">Read, Gemma J.M.</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Gender+%26+Education%22">Gender & Education</searchLink>. Aug2024, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p581-598. 18p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methodology%22">Methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discourse+analysis%22">Discourse analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+quotas%22">Political quotas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neoliberalism%22">Neoliberalism</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The paper examines a 'circulatory' system of gender inequity in Australian universities where gender bias prevents women from accessing senior decision-making roles and stultifies their capacity to act as gender change agents. It has been mooted that equity quotas for senior roles can derail this circuit of male privilege in academia. Yet a plastic reading of the shape of gender equity policy and practice in Australian universities over the last 40 years reveals an increasing acceptance of individualism, which positions women's liberation as being achievable through self-responsibilisation. If these discourses remain unchallenged, gender quotas for senior roles alone will likely only benefit those entrepreneurial women admitted to senior positions, rendering the causes of gender inequity hidden and exonerated. Using a novel methodology that combines a 'plastic' with a complex systems lens of policy manoeuvres, we suggest gender quotas, accompanied by strategy designed to develop leaders' gender competency and change agency, are required to support more sustainably equitable work structure within the academy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Gender & Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=178440451
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09540253.2024.2370270
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 581
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discourse analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Political quotas
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neoliberalism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Gender quotas are not enough: the need for multiple strategies to address gender equity in Australian universities.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Crimmins, Gail
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Marshall, Elvessa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Read, Gemma J.M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09540253
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 36
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Gender & Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1