Cross-Cultural Logic and the Limits of Comparative Pedagogy: A Case Study Considering (Why Not to Include) Jain Logic as Part of an Introduction to Logic Course.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Cross-Cultural Logic and the Limits of Comparative Pedagogy: A Case Study Considering (Why Not to Include) Jain Logic as Part of an Introduction to Logic Course.
Authors: Creller, Aaron B.
Source: Teaching Philosophy. Sep2024, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p365-373. 9p.
Subject Terms: *Comparative education, *Educational objectives, Cross-cultural studies, Logic, Philosophical analysis
Abstract: There is a tension between the pedagogical aim of comparative and cross-cultural inclusion and teaching an introductory-level deductive logic course. On the one hand, those who are interested in including non-"Western" sources are doing so in order to expand the philosophical content under consideration in their courses. On the other, it seems that the student learning objectives for deductive logic classes aimed at novices are narrow and specific for the purpose of developing a particular skill. This paper highlights the challenge of teaching logic cross-culturally by arguing that it is inadvisable to do so. Using Jain logic as a case study, it illustrates that even though there is depth available in the content, the contextual support needed to compare logics without being reductive would interfere with the amount of time needed to develop deductive logic skills in students in the first place. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Teaching Philosophy is the property of Philosophy Documentation Center and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 179042837
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Cross-Cultural Logic and the Limits of Comparative Pedagogy: A Case Study Considering (Why Not to Include) Jain Logic as Part of an Introduction to Logic Course.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Creller%2C+Aaron+B%2E%22">Creller, Aaron B.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Teaching+Philosophy%22">Teaching Philosophy</searchLink>. Sep2024, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p365-373. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+education%22">Comparative education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+objectives%22">Educational objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross-cultural+studies%22">Cross-cultural studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logic%22">Logic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophical+analysis%22">Philosophical analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: There is a tension between the pedagogical aim of comparative and cross-cultural inclusion and teaching an introductory-level deductive logic course. On the one hand, those who are interested in including non-"Western" sources are doing so in order to expand the philosophical content under consideration in their courses. On the other, it seems that the student learning objectives for deductive logic classes aimed at novices are narrow and specific for the purpose of developing a particular skill. This paper highlights the challenge of teaching logic cross-culturally by arguing that it is inadvisable to do so. Using Jain logic as a case study, it illustrates that even though there is depth available in the content, the contextual support needed to compare logics without being reductive would interfere with the amount of time needed to develop deductive logic skills in students in the first place. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Teaching Philosophy is the property of Philosophy Documentation Center and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=179042837
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.5840/teachphil2024722204
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 365
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Comparative education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational objectives
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-cultural studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Logic
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Philosophical analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Cross-Cultural Logic and the Limits of Comparative Pedagogy: A Case Study Considering (Why Not to Include) Jain Logic as Part of an Introduction to Logic Course.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Creller, Aaron B.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01455788
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 47
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Teaching Philosophy
              Type: main
ResultId 1