View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Reflections on a mentored group peer review process.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Reflections on a mentored group peer review process.
Authors: Auby, Harpreet1,2 (AUTHOR), Grundy, Lorena S.1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Huffman, Sandra4 (AUTHOR), Cantilina, Kaylla2 (AUTHOR), Gavitte, Samuel B.1,2 (AUTHOR), Kaczynski, Sarah E.2,3 (AUTHOR), Penyai, Melissa5 (AUTHOR), Koretsky, Milo D.1,2,3 (AUTHOR) milo.koretsky@tufts.edu
Source: Journal of Engineering Education. Oct2024, Vol. 113 Issue 4, p1110-1114. 5p.
Subject Terms: *Career development, *Faculty advisors, *Peer review of students, Peer review committees, Quality control
Abstract: The article discusses the challenges and benefits of peer review in research, particularly in the field of engineering education. It highlights the importance of improving the peer review process to address biases, delays, and errors in publications. The article presents a mentored group peer review process within an engineering research group as a way to enhance the quality of reviews, develop reviewers' skills, and foster a sense of community and collaboration. The process involves structured group interactions, feedback incorporation, and reflective discussions to support the growth of both novice and experienced reviewers. The article concludes with recommendations for research groups interested in implementing group peer review practices to enhance scholarly development among graduate students and postdocs. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 180387478
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Reflections on a mentored group peer review process.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Auby%2C+Harpreet%22">Auby, Harpreet</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grundy%2C+Lorena+S%2E%22">Grundy, Lorena S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huffman%2C+Sandra%22">Huffman, Sandra</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cantilina%2C+Kaylla%22">Cantilina, Kaylla</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gavitte%2C+Samuel+B%2E%22">Gavitte, Samuel B.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kaczynski%2C+Sarah+E%2E%22">Kaczynski, Sarah E.</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Penyai%2C+Melissa%22">Penyai, Melissa</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koretsky%2C+Milo+D%2E%22">Koretsky, Milo D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> milo.koretsky@tufts.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22">Journal of Engineering Education</searchLink>. Oct2024, Vol. 113 Issue 4, p1110-1114. 5p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Career+development%22">Career development</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+advisors%22">Faculty advisors</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+review+of+students%22">Peer review of students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+review+committees%22">Peer review committees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+control%22">Quality control</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article discusses the challenges and benefits of peer review in research, particularly in the field of engineering education. It highlights the importance of improving the peer review process to address biases, delays, and errors in publications. The article presents a mentored group peer review process within an engineering research group as a way to enhance the quality of reviews, develop reviewers' skills, and foster a sense of community and collaboration. The process involves structured group interactions, feedback incorporation, and reflective discussions to support the growth of both novice and experienced reviewers. The article concludes with recommendations for research groups interested in implementing group peer review practices to enhance scholarly development among graduate students and postdocs. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=180387478
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/jee.20616
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 1110
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Career development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faculty advisors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Peer review of students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Peer review committees
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality control
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Reflections on a mentored group peer review process.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Auby, Harpreet
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Grundy, Lorena S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huffman, Sandra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cantilina, Kaylla
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gavitte, Samuel B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kaczynski, Sarah E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Penyai, Melissa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Koretsky, Milo D.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10694730
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 113
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Engineering Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1