Student Ratings of Instruction: Updating Measures to Reflect Recent Scholarship.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Student Ratings of Instruction: Updating Measures to Reflect Recent Scholarship.
Authors: Dyer, Kathleen D.1 (AUTHOR) kdyer@mail.fresnostate.edu, Donnelly-Hermosillo, Dermot2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Research in Higher Education. Nov2024, Vol. 65 Issue 7, p1587-1613. 27p.
Subject Terms: *Student evaluation of teachers, *Scholarly method, Customer satisfaction, Race, Sex discrimination
Abstract: This study aimed to demonstrate how one university worked to overcome some of the measurement problems associated with legacy student rating instruments through the creation and investigation of a new student rating instrument based on the most current scholarship on teaching and learning. Measurement problems with legacy instruments include asking about consumer satisfaction (including the use of global ratings) rather than directly assessing the quality of teaching, asking students for self-reports of learning, and asking students to make judgments about the internal state of their instructors. A new instrument was created to intentionally reduce these problems. The new instrument and its predecessor were both administered by 54 instructors in 81 classes and completed by 2,013 students. The following semester, the new instrument was administered university-wide including 1,450 instructors, 3,669 classes, and 58,320 students. The findings indicate that the new instrument created by this process is both reliable and valid but does not reflect multidimensionality. There is also no compelling evidence of bias according to gender or race. This work illustrates the process by which new and better instruments might be created and tested in order to replace flawed legacy instruments in higher education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Research in Higher Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 180588925
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Student Ratings of Instruction: Updating Measures to Reflect Recent Scholarship.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dyer%2C+Kathleen+D%2E%22">Dyer, Kathleen D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> kdyer@mail.fresnostate.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Donnelly-Hermosillo%2C+Dermot%22">Donnelly-Hermosillo, Dermot</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Research+in+Higher+Education%22">Research in Higher Education</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 65 Issue 7, p1587-1613. 27p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+evaluation+of+teachers%22">Student evaluation of teachers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+method%22">Scholarly method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Customer+satisfaction%22">Customer satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Race%22">Race</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+discrimination%22">Sex discrimination</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study aimed to demonstrate how one university worked to overcome some of the measurement problems associated with legacy student rating instruments through the creation and investigation of a new student rating instrument based on the most current scholarship on teaching and learning. Measurement problems with legacy instruments include asking about consumer satisfaction (including the use of global ratings) rather than directly assessing the quality of teaching, asking students for self-reports of learning, and asking students to make judgments about the internal state of their instructors. A new instrument was created to intentionally reduce these problems. The new instrument and its predecessor were both administered by 54 instructors in 81 classes and completed by 2,013 students. The following semester, the new instrument was administered university-wide including 1,450 instructors, 3,669 classes, and 58,320 students. The findings indicate that the new instrument created by this process is both reliable and valid but does not reflect multidimensionality. There is also no compelling evidence of bias according to gender or race. This work illustrates the process by which new and better instruments might be created and tested in order to replace flawed legacy instruments in higher education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Research in Higher Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=180588925
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11162-024-09804-8
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 27
        StartPage: 1587
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Student evaluation of teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scholarly method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Customer satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Race
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sex discrimination
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Student Ratings of Instruction: Updating Measures to Reflect Recent Scholarship.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dyer, Kathleen D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Donnelly-Hermosillo, Dermot
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03610365
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 65
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Research in Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1