Are We Asking Too Much of OER? A Conversation on OER from OE Global 2023.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are We Asking Too Much of OER? A Conversation on OER from OE Global 2023.
Authors: Flinn, Chad1, Openo, Jason2
Source: International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning. Nov2024, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p201-214. 14p.
Subject Terms: *Intellectual property, *Electronic textbooks, *Education conferences, *Educational technology, *Conversation, Social intelligence, Trade secrets
Geographic Terms: Edmonton (Alta.)
Abstract: This paper examines the pervasive discourse of disruption in OER literature by recounting a facilitated conversation hosted at the 2023 Open Education Global conference held in Edmonton, Alberta. This dialogue used Bacchi's "what is the problem represented to be" (WPR) approach to structure the conversation in four movements. The first movement problematized the concept of OER by discussing the educational challenges OER supposedly addresses, such as the high cost of textbooks. The second movement considered the genealogy, historical development, and philosophical underpinnings of OER. The third movement accounted for the disruptors within the OER movement, exploring what OER have disrupted and discussing if disruption is even a legitimate goal of OER. The fourth and final movement pivoted to examine resistors and forms of resistance to OER, including the protection of intellectual property rights, copyright concerns, and Marcuse's idea of repressive tolerance. This single conversation generated a small but important piece of social intelligence within a much larger dialogue about open education, open pedagogy, and OER during a time of flux (characterized by intense politicization, the relentless progression of educational technology, the intensification of marketization, and the growing popularity of all-inclusive textbooks). This social intelligence can be used to guide the next transition phase for OER development. While the conversation does not offer tidy solutions or even clear recommendations, it does suggest that the next wave of OER practitioners would always do well to focus on the goals OER can achieve, not what they hope to disrupt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning is the property of Governors of Athabasca University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 181002577
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Are We Asking Too Much of OER? A Conversation on OER from OE Global 2023.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Flinn%2C+Chad%22">Flinn, Chad</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Openo%2C+Jason%22">Openo, Jason</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Review+of+Research+in+Open+%26+Distributed+Learning%22">International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p201-214. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intellectual+property%22">Intellectual property</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+textbooks%22">Electronic textbooks</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+conferences%22">Education conferences</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+technology%22">Educational technology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conversation%22">Conversation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+intelligence%22">Social intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trade+secrets%22">Trade secrets</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Edmonton+%28Alta%2E%29%22">Edmonton (Alta.)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper examines the pervasive discourse of disruption in OER literature by recounting a facilitated conversation hosted at the 2023 Open Education Global conference held in Edmonton, Alberta. This dialogue used Bacchi's "what is the problem represented to be" (WPR) approach to structure the conversation in four movements. The first movement problematized the concept of OER by discussing the educational challenges OER supposedly addresses, such as the high cost of textbooks. The second movement considered the genealogy, historical development, and philosophical underpinnings of OER. The third movement accounted for the disruptors within the OER movement, exploring what OER have disrupted and discussing if disruption is even a legitimate goal of OER. The fourth and final movement pivoted to examine resistors and forms of resistance to OER, including the protection of intellectual property rights, copyright concerns, and Marcuse's idea of repressive tolerance. This single conversation generated a small but important piece of social intelligence within a much larger dialogue about open education, open pedagogy, and OER during a time of flux (characterized by intense politicization, the relentless progression of educational technology, the intensification of marketization, and the growing popularity of all-inclusive textbooks). This social intelligence can be used to guide the next transition phase for OER development. While the conversation does not offer tidy solutions or even clear recommendations, it does suggest that the next wave of OER practitioners would always do well to focus on the goals OER can achieve, not what they hope to disrupt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning is the property of Governors of Athabasca University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=181002577
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7744
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 201
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Intellectual property
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic textbooks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Education conferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conversation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trade secrets
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Edmonton (Alta.)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Are We Asking Too Much of OER? A Conversation on OER from OE Global 2023.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Flinn, Chad
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Openo, Jason
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 14923831
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 25
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1