View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Right but wrong: How students' mechanistic reasoning and conceptual understandings shift when designing agent‐based models using data.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Right but wrong: How students' mechanistic reasoning and conceptual understandings shift when designing agent‐based models using data.
Authors: Fuhrmann, Tamar1 (AUTHOR) tf2464@tc.columbia.edu, Rosenbaum, Leah1 (AUTHOR), Wagh, Aditi2 (AUTHOR), Eloy, Adelmo1 (AUTHOR), Wolf, Jacob3 (AUTHOR), Blikstein, Paulo1 (AUTHOR), Wilkerson, Michelle4 (AUTHOR)
Source: Science Education. Jan2025, Vol. 109 Issue 1, p3-26. 24p.
Subject Terms: *Sixth grade (Education), *Simulation methods in education, *Science education, *Computer simulation, Hot water
Abstract: When learning about scientific phenomena, students are expected to mechanistically explain how underlying interactions produce the observable phenomenon and conceptually connect the observed phenomenon to canonical scientific knowledge. This paper investigates how the integration of the complementary processes of designing and refining computational models using real‐world data can support students in developing mechanistic and canonically accurate explanations of diffusion. Specifically, we examine two types of shifts in how students explain diffusion as they create and refine computational models using real‐world data: a shift towards mechanistic reasoning and a shift from noncanonical to canonical explanations. We present descriptive statistics for the whole class as well as three student work examples to illustrate these two shifts as 6th grade students engage in an 8‐day unit on the diffusion of ink in hot and cold water. Our findings show that (1) students develop mechanistic explanations as they build agent‐based models, (2) students' mechanistic reasoning can co‐exist with noncanonical explanations, and (3) students shift their thinking toward canonical explanations after comparing their models against data. These findings could inform the design of modeling tools that support learners in both expressing a diverse range of mechanistic explanations of scientific phenomena and aligning those explanations with canonical science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Science Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 182008674
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Right but wrong: How students' mechanistic reasoning and conceptual understandings shift when designing agent‐based models using data.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fuhrmann%2C+Tamar%22">Fuhrmann, Tamar</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> tf2464@tc.columbia.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rosenbaum%2C+Leah%22">Rosenbaum, Leah</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wagh%2C+Aditi%22">Wagh, Aditi</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eloy%2C+Adelmo%22">Eloy, Adelmo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wolf%2C+Jacob%22">Wolf, Jacob</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Blikstein%2C+Paulo%22">Blikstein, Paulo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wilkerson%2C+Michelle%22">Wilkerson, Michelle</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Science+Education%22">Science Education</searchLink>. Jan2025, Vol. 109 Issue 1, p3-26. 24p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sixth+grade+%28Education%29%22">Sixth grade (Education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Simulation+methods+in+education%22">Simulation methods in education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+education%22">Science education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+simulation%22">Computer simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hot+water%22">Hot water</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: When learning about scientific phenomena, students are expected to mechanistically explain how underlying interactions produce the observable phenomenon and conceptually connect the observed phenomenon to canonical scientific knowledge. This paper investigates how the integration of the complementary processes of designing and refining computational models using real‐world data can support students in developing mechanistic and canonically accurate explanations of diffusion. Specifically, we examine two types of shifts in how students explain diffusion as they create and refine computational models using real‐world data: a shift towards mechanistic reasoning and a shift from noncanonical to canonical explanations. We present descriptive statistics for the whole class as well as three student work examples to illustrate these two shifts as 6th grade students engage in an 8‐day unit on the diffusion of ink in hot and cold water. Our findings show that (1) students develop mechanistic explanations as they build agent‐based models, (2) students' mechanistic reasoning can co‐exist with noncanonical explanations, and (3) students shift their thinking toward canonical explanations after comparing their models against data. These findings could inform the design of modeling tools that support learners in both expressing a diverse range of mechanistic explanations of scientific phenomena and aligning those explanations with canonical science. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Science Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=182008674
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/sce.21890
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 24
        StartPage: 3
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Sixth grade (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Simulation methods in education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer simulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hot water
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Right but wrong: How students' mechanistic reasoning and conceptual understandings shift when designing agent‐based models using data.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fuhrmann, Tamar
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rosenbaum, Leah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wagh, Aditi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Eloy, Adelmo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wolf, Jacob
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Blikstein, Paulo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wilkerson, Michelle
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00368326
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 109
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Science Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1