'Emancipation' in Digital Nomadism vs in the Nation-State: A Comparative Analysis of Idealtypes.
Saved in:
| Title: | 'Emancipation' in Digital Nomadism vs in the Nation-State: A Comparative Analysis of Idealtypes. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wang, Blair1 (AUTHOR) blair.wang@universityofgalway.ie, Schlagwein, Daniel2 (AUTHOR) schlagwein@sydney.edu.au, Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka3 (AUTHOR) dubravka@unsw.edu.au, Cahalane, Michael C.3 (AUTHOR) m.cahalane@unsw.edu.au |
| Source: | Journal of Business Ethics. 9/11/2024, Vol. 198 Issue 1, p35-68. 34p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Knowledge workers, *Comparative studies, Digital nomads, Liberty, Lifestyles, Nation-state |
| Abstract: | Academic and public debate is continuing about whether digital nomadism, a new Internet-enabled phenomenon in which digital workers adopt a neo-nomadic global lifestyle, represents 'real' emancipation for knowledge workers—or if it is, instead, the opposite. Based on a field study of digital nomadism, and accepting a pluralist approach to emancipation, we analyse the 'emancipatory project(s)' that digital nomads engage in. This analysis, following Weberian idealtypes, employs a tripartite structure: unsatisfactory conditions (what people want to overcome); emancipatory means (actions taken); and emancipatory ends (desired outcomes). We critically compare digital nomadism to the traditional descriptions of emancipatory projects in nation-state contexts, as found in prior literature, using the same analytical framework. Juxtaposing these idealtypes, we discuss similarities and differences and analyse their inherent assumptions, logics and ethical stances. We conclude that digital nomadism generates an emancipation that is very much 'real' for digital nomads, whose experience cannot be disregarded, but with a 'postmodern' ethos that is at odds with modernity and its ethos originating from the Enlightenment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 184385332 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: 'Emancipation' in Digital Nomadism vs in the Nation-State: A Comparative Analysis of Idealtypes. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Blair%22">Wang, Blair</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> blair.wang@universityofgalway.ie</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schlagwein%2C+Daniel%22">Schlagwein, Daniel</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> schlagwein@sydney.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cecez-Kecmanovic%2C+Dubravka%22">Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> dubravka@unsw.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cahalane%2C+Michael+C%2E%22">Cahalane, Michael C.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> m.cahalane@unsw.edu.au</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Business+Ethics%22">Journal of Business Ethics</searchLink>. 9/11/2024, Vol. 198 Issue 1, p35-68. 34p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+workers%22">Knowledge workers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+nomads%22">Digital nomads</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Liberty%22">Liberty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lifestyles%22">Lifestyles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nation-state%22">Nation-state</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Academic and public debate is continuing about whether digital nomadism, a new Internet-enabled phenomenon in which digital workers adopt a neo-nomadic global lifestyle, represents 'real' emancipation for knowledge workers—or if it is, instead, the opposite. Based on a field study of digital nomadism, and accepting a pluralist approach to emancipation, we analyse the 'emancipatory project(s)' that digital nomads engage in. This analysis, following Weberian idealtypes, employs a tripartite structure: unsatisfactory conditions (what people want to overcome); emancipatory means (actions taken); and emancipatory ends (desired outcomes). We critically compare digital nomadism to the traditional descriptions of emancipatory projects in nation-state contexts, as found in prior literature, using the same analytical framework. Juxtaposing these idealtypes, we discuss similarities and differences and analyse their inherent assumptions, logics and ethical stances. We conclude that digital nomadism generates an emancipation that is very much 'real' for digital nomads, whose experience cannot be disregarded, but with a 'postmodern' ethos that is at odds with modernity and its ethos originating from the Enlightenment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=184385332 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10551-024-05699-8 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 StartPage: 35 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Knowledge workers Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Digital nomads Type: general – SubjectFull: Liberty Type: general – SubjectFull: Lifestyles Type: general – SubjectFull: Nation-state Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: 'Emancipation' in Digital Nomadism vs in the Nation-State: A Comparative Analysis of Idealtypes. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Blair – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Schlagwein, Daniel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cahalane, Michael C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 11 M: 09 Text: 9/11/2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01674544 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 198 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Business Ethics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
