View in EDS

A comparative analysis of error correction procedures for skill acquisition in autistic students.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A comparative analysis of error correction procedures for skill acquisition in autistic students.
Authors: Rizos, Konstantinos1 (AUTHOR) kon.rizos@hotmail.com, Fattal, Sarah1 (AUTHOR) sarahfattal@hotmail.co.uk, Gouws, Marlizanne1 (AUTHOR) marli8888@gmail.com, Meyer, Sophie1 (AUTHOR) sophie.meyer1@btinternet.com, Vostanis, Athanasios2 (AUTHOR) A.Vostanis@kent.ac.uk
Source: Tizard Learning Disability Review. 2025, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p77-88. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Treatment of learning disabilities, *Autism, *Educational outcomes, *Teaching methods, *Ability, *Asperger's syndrome, *Special education, *Comparative studies, *Training, *Adolescence
Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two error correction methods – Model Prompt Switch Repeat (MPSR) and Error Statement, Modelling and Active student Response (ESMASR) – for teaching new skills to autistic students. This study evaluates which method results in faster and more effective skill mastery, measured by the number of trials needed to reach the mastery criterion, and assesses long-term retention of learned skills. Design/methodology/approach: Using a multiple-treatment reversal design within an Applied Behaviour Analysis framework, this study involved four participants aged 13–15 years. The participants were taught using both MPSR and ESMASR methods, with data collected on how quickly they mastered new skills. Maintenance data were gathered at one and four weeks after teaching to assess skills retention. Findings: This study found that the MPSR method led to faster and more sustained skill acquisition than ESMASR for most participants. MPSR demonstrated better long-term retention in several cases. These results emphasise the effectiveness of structured error correction procedures in improving learning outcomes for autistic students. Research limitations/implications: Because of the small sample size and focus on a specific educational setting, the findings of this study may not apply broadly. Future research should test these methods across a wider variety of learners and settings to ensure broader applicability and validation of the results. Practical implications: This study's findings offer practical strategies for educators working with autistic students, showing that structured error correction procedures like MPSR can be integrated into daily teaching to improve skill acquisition and retention. These strategies can also inform educator training and instructional planning. Social implications: This study contributes to a more inclusive education system by offering evidence-based methods that help autistic students succeed. By identifying effective teaching techniques, this research supports efforts to ensure equal educational opportunities for neurodivergent learners. Originality/value: This study fills a gap in research by comparing two specific error correction methods in an ABA setting, providing fresh insights into which strategies most effectively promote skill acquisition and long-term learning in autistic students. This study also offers practical guidance for educators seeking evidence-based methods to improve student outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Tizard Learning Disability Review is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 184786609
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A comparative analysis of error correction procedures for skill acquisition in autistic students.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rizos%2C+Konstantinos%22">Rizos, Konstantinos</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> kon.rizos@hotmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fattal%2C+Sarah%22">Fattal, Sarah</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> sarahfattal@hotmail.co.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gouws%2C+Marlizanne%22">Gouws, Marlizanne</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> marli8888@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meyer%2C+Sophie%22">Meyer, Sophie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> sophie.meyer1@btinternet.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vostanis%2C+Athanasios%22">Vostanis, Athanasios</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> A.Vostanis@kent.ac.uk</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Tizard+Learning+Disability+Review%22">Tizard Learning Disability Review</searchLink>. 2025, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p77-88. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+of+learning+disabilities%22">Treatment of learning disabilities</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Autism%22">Autism</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ability%22">Ability</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Asperger's+syndrome%22">Asperger's syndrome</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+education%22">Special education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Training%22">Training</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adolescence%22">Adolescence</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two error correction methods – Model Prompt Switch Repeat (MPSR) and Error Statement, Modelling and Active student Response (ESMASR) – for teaching new skills to autistic students. This study evaluates which method results in faster and more effective skill mastery, measured by the number of trials needed to reach the mastery criterion, and assesses long-term retention of learned skills. Design/methodology/approach: Using a multiple-treatment reversal design within an Applied Behaviour Analysis framework, this study involved four participants aged 13–15 years. The participants were taught using both MPSR and ESMASR methods, with data collected on how quickly they mastered new skills. Maintenance data were gathered at one and four weeks after teaching to assess skills retention. Findings: This study found that the MPSR method led to faster and more sustained skill acquisition than ESMASR for most participants. MPSR demonstrated better long-term retention in several cases. These results emphasise the effectiveness of structured error correction procedures in improving learning outcomes for autistic students. Research limitations/implications: Because of the small sample size and focus on a specific educational setting, the findings of this study may not apply broadly. Future research should test these methods across a wider variety of learners and settings to ensure broader applicability and validation of the results. Practical implications: This study's findings offer practical strategies for educators working with autistic students, showing that structured error correction procedures like MPSR can be integrated into daily teaching to improve skill acquisition and retention. These strategies can also inform educator training and instructional planning. Social implications: This study contributes to a more inclusive education system by offering evidence-based methods that help autistic students succeed. By identifying effective teaching techniques, this research supports efforts to ensure equal educational opportunities for neurodivergent learners. Originality/value: This study fills a gap in research by comparing two specific error correction methods in an ABA setting, providing fresh insights into which strategies most effectively promote skill acquisition and long-term learning in autistic students. This study also offers practical guidance for educators seeking evidence-based methods to improve student outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Tizard Learning Disability Review is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=184786609
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1108/TLDR-07-2024-0030
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 77
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Treatment of learning disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Autism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Asperger's syndrome
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Special education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Training
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adolescence
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A comparative analysis of error correction procedures for skill acquisition in autistic students.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rizos, Konstantinos
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fattal, Sarah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gouws, Marlizanne
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meyer, Sophie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vostanis, Athanasios
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: 2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13595474
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Tizard Learning Disability Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1