Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation.
Saved in:
| Title: | Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Graham, Benjamin C.1 benjamincgraham@gmail.com, Burkhalter, Stephanie1,2 |
| Source: | Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. Mar2025, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p127-152. 26p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Policy sciences, *Diversity & inclusion policies, *Qualitative research, Social justice, Consumer attitudes, Interviewing, Equality, Social integration, Practical politics, Patient participation |
| Geographic Terms: | California |
| Abstract: | Democratic innovations offer a promising set of interventions to empower citizens, reduce polarization, and reimagine participatory governance. This article examines the Petaluma Fairgrounds Advisory Panel (PFAP), a citizens assembly convened to deliberate the future of a locally significant property. This qualitative study consisted of 15 panelist interviews exploring panelist experiences of nine equity strategies incorporated into the PFAP design as well as broader themes around how equity was conceptualized. Certain equity strategies emerged as particularly salient in shaping panelists' experiences, underscoring the significance of specific design components in fostering equity. In most cases appraisals were positive, though several critiques and negative assessments were mentioned. Panelist conceptualizations of equity centered around notions of fairness and belonging. The current study offers a window into how strategies to promote equity are experienced, and can inform participatory and deliberative practices that seek to effectively incorporate values of equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 185487967 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Graham%2C+Benjamin+C%2E%22">Graham, Benjamin C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> benjamincgraham@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkhalter%2C+Stephanie%22">Burkhalter, Stephanie</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Prevention+%26+Intervention+in+the+Community%22">Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community</searchLink>. Mar2025, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p127-152. 26p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+sciences%22">Policy sciences</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+%26+inclusion+policies%22">Diversity & inclusion policies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+justice%22">Social justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consumer+attitudes%22">Consumer attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equality%22">Equality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+integration%22">Social integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Practical+politics%22">Practical politics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+participation%22">Patient participation</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California%22">California</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Democratic innovations offer a promising set of interventions to empower citizens, reduce polarization, and reimagine participatory governance. This article examines the Petaluma Fairgrounds Advisory Panel (PFAP), a citizens assembly convened to deliberate the future of a locally significant property. This qualitative study consisted of 15 panelist interviews exploring panelist experiences of nine equity strategies incorporated into the PFAP design as well as broader themes around how equity was conceptualized. Certain equity strategies emerged as particularly salient in shaping panelists' experiences, underscoring the significance of specific design components in fostering equity. In most cases appraisals were positive, though several critiques and negative assessments were mentioned. Panelist conceptualizations of equity centered around notions of fairness and belonging. The current study offers a window into how strategies to promote equity are experienced, and can inform participatory and deliberative practices that seek to effectively incorporate values of equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=185487967 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10852352.2024.2441601 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 StartPage: 127 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Policy sciences Type: general – SubjectFull: Diversity & inclusion policies Type: general – SubjectFull: Qualitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Social justice Type: general – SubjectFull: Consumer attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Equality Type: general – SubjectFull: Social integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Practical politics Type: general – SubjectFull: Patient participation Type: general – SubjectFull: California Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Graham, Benjamin C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burkhalter, Stephanie IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10852352 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 53 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
