View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response elicited using narrowband chirps: A comparison with tone burst auditory brainstem response.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response elicited using narrowband chirps: A comparison with tone burst auditory brainstem response.
Authors: Khan, Qudsiyyah1 (AUTHOR), Vanaja, C. S.2 (AUTHOR) csvanaja@gmail.com
Source: Journal of the All India Institute of Speech & Hearing. Jan-Jun2025, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p24-36. 13p.
Subject Terms: *Statistical correlation, *Audiometry, *Auditory perception, Sensorineural hearing loss, Judgment sampling, Descriptive statistics, Brain stem, Friedman test (Statistics), Analysis of variance, Hearing levels, Data analysis software, Auditory evoked response
Abstract: Purpose: This study aimed to compare hearing thresholds estimated using three different electrophysiological measures – auditory brainstem response (ABR) for narrow band level specific chirp (NB LS chirp ABR), ABR for tone bursts (TBABR), and auditory steady state responses (NB chirp ASSR) for NB chirp stimuli. Materials and Methods: A repeated-measures study design with purposive sampling was used to assess 27 ears with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and 26 ears with normal hearing. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 70 years. NB chirp ASSR, TBABR, and NB LS chirp ABR were recorded to obtain electrophysiological hearing thresholds. The difference between electrophysiological threshold and audiometric threshold (referred to as D), obtained for all electrophysiological tests, was compared. Also, audiometric thresholds predicted from electrophysiological tests were compared with thresholds obtained through pure-tone audiometry. Results: Friedman analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the D obtained for NB chirp ASSR and NB LS chirp ABR. A significant difference was observed between the D obtained for TBABR and NB chirp ASSR as well as NB LS chirp ABR. Bland–Altman analysis revealed that least bias, as well as the strongest correlation between audiometric threshold and predicted audiometric threshold, was obtained for NB LS chirp ABR. Conclusion: NB LS chirp-evoked ABR is a good test for estimating hearing thresholds in individuals with SNHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the All India Institute of Speech & Hearing is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 186960636
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response elicited using narrowband chirps: A comparison with tone burst auditory brainstem response.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Khan%2C+Qudsiyyah%22">Khan, Qudsiyyah</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vanaja%2C+C%2E+S%2E%22">Vanaja, C. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> csvanaja@gmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+All+India+Institute+of+Speech+%26+Hearing%22">Journal of the All India Institute of Speech & Hearing</searchLink>. Jan-Jun2025, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p24-36. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+correlation%22">Statistical correlation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Audiometry%22">Audiometry</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Auditory+perception%22">Auditory perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensorineural+hearing+loss%22">Sensorineural hearing loss</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+sampling%22">Judgment sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Brain+stem%22">Brain stem</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Friedman+test+%28Statistics%29%22">Friedman test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analysis+of+variance%22">Analysis of variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+levels%22">Hearing levels</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Auditory+evoked+response%22">Auditory evoked response</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: This study aimed to compare hearing thresholds estimated using three different electrophysiological measures – auditory brainstem response (ABR) for narrow band level specific chirp (NB LS chirp ABR), ABR for tone bursts (TBABR), and auditory steady state responses (NB chirp ASSR) for NB chirp stimuli. Materials and Methods: A repeated-measures study design with purposive sampling was used to assess 27 ears with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and 26 ears with normal hearing. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 70 years. NB chirp ASSR, TBABR, and NB LS chirp ABR were recorded to obtain electrophysiological hearing thresholds. The difference between electrophysiological threshold and audiometric threshold (referred to as D), obtained for all electrophysiological tests, was compared. Also, audiometric thresholds predicted from electrophysiological tests were compared with thresholds obtained through pure-tone audiometry. Results: Friedman analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the D obtained for NB chirp ASSR and NB LS chirp ABR. A significant difference was observed between the D obtained for TBABR and NB chirp ASSR as well as NB LS chirp ABR. Bland–Altman analysis revealed that least bias, as well as the strongest correlation between audiometric threshold and predicted audiometric threshold, was obtained for NB LS chirp ABR. Conclusion: NB LS chirp-evoked ABR is a good test for estimating hearing thresholds in individuals with SNHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the All India Institute of Speech & Hearing is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=186960636
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.4103/jose.JOSE_9_24
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 24
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Statistical correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Audiometry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Auditory perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensorineural hearing loss
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Judgment sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Brain stem
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Friedman test (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Analysis of variance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hearing levels
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Auditory evoked response
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response elicited using narrowband chirps: A comparison with tone burst auditory brainstem response.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Khan, Qudsiyyah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vanaja, C. S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan-Jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0973662X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 44
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the All India Institute of Speech & Hearing
              Type: main
ResultId 1