The Model for Convivial Tools Applied to ChatGPT.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Model for Convivial Tools Applied to ChatGPT.
Authors: Shevock, Daniel J.1, Holster, Jacob2
Source: Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education. Jun2025, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p165-201. 37p.
Subject Terms: *Music education, *Music facilities, Chatbots, Human-artificial intelligence interaction
Abstract: The current paper utilizes the Model for Convivial Tools to assess the advantages and disadvantages of adopting generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, like ChatGPT, in music classrooms. This model brings to the fore the potential of ChatGPT to affect community, instigate environmental harms, advance access and ease, and support agency. This model involves analyzing the adoption of new technological tools through the following four categories: community, waste, convenient/foolproof/accessible/noncoercive/repairable/dependable, and agency. The authors use personal experience with ChatGPT to demonstrate how music educators, curriculum writers, and policy makers can assess adoption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education is the property of Mayday Group and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:The current paper utilizes the Model for Convivial Tools to assess the advantages and disadvantages of adopting generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, like ChatGPT, in music classrooms. This model brings to the fore the potential of ChatGPT to affect community, instigate environmental harms, advance access and ease, and support agency. This model involves analyzing the adoption of new technological tools through the following four categories: community, waste, convenient/foolproof/accessible/noncoercive/repairable/dependable, and agency. The authors use personal experience with ChatGPT to demonstrate how music educators, curriculum writers, and policy makers can assess adoption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15454517
DOI:10.22176/act24.3.165