Assessing the validity of utaut among higher education instructors: a meta-analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessing the validity of utaut among higher education instructors: a meta-analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Noureddine, Rasha1 (AUTHOR) Rasha.Noureddine@ucf.edu, Boote, David1 (AUTHOR) David.Boote@ucf.edu, Campbell, Laurie O.1 (AUTHOR) locampbell@ucf.edu |
| Source: | Education & Information Technologies. Aug2025, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p16687-16719. 33p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Higher education, *Adoption of ideas, *College teachers, Innovation adoption, Technology Acceptance Model, Social influence, Self-efficacy |
| Abstract: | A meta-analytic study was conducted of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to understand higher education instructors use of technology in teaching and learning. Through broad searches of the years 2003–2023, 117 records were identified for initial review. After reviewing the studies and removing those studies that were duplicates or did not meet the search criteria, ten studies remained for analysis. These ten studies representing global locales were analyzed for this meta-analysis. Results indicated that Performance Expectancy, (= 0.5398) (95% CI: 0.3052—0.7744), p < 0.0001; Effort Expectancy, (= 0.4846) (95% CI: 0.2695—0.6997), p < 0.0001; and Social Influence (= 0.2783) (95% CI: 0.0796—0.4770), p = 0.0061 are strong to moderate predictors of technology adoption; and Facilitating Conditions predict Use Behavior. The findings suggest that faculty need adequate support to ensure they adopt instructional technologies. Institutional policies and professional development initiatives should be designed to emphasize the practical benefits of a specific technology (PE), ensure both adequate training for digital literacy and selection of practical technologies (EE), and provide open and collaborative training environments with clear administrative expectations (SI). Additionally, the significance of robust infrastructure and support systems (FC) to actual use is made explicit. Addressing these factors can improve adoption among instructors, fostering innovation and enhancing the higher education learning experience. Future research should focus on the effect of moderating variables on technology adopting to reduce the heterogeneity found in the current study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Education & Information Technologies is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 187261669 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessing the validity of utaut among higher education instructors: a meta-analysis. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Noureddine%2C+Rasha%22">Noureddine, Rasha</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Rasha.Noureddine@ucf.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boote%2C+David%22">Boote, David</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> David.Boote@ucf.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Campbell%2C+Laurie+O%2E%22">Campbell, Laurie O.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> locampbell@ucf.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Education+%26+Information+Technologies%22">Education & Information Technologies</searchLink>. Aug2025, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p16687-16719. 33p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adoption+of+ideas%22">Adoption of ideas</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teachers%22">College teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Innovation+adoption%22">Innovation adoption</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Acceptance+Model%22">Technology Acceptance Model</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+influence%22">Social influence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: A meta-analytic study was conducted of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to understand higher education instructors use of technology in teaching and learning. Through broad searches of the years 2003–2023, 117 records were identified for initial review. After reviewing the studies and removing those studies that were duplicates or did not meet the search criteria, ten studies remained for analysis. These ten studies representing global locales were analyzed for this meta-analysis. Results indicated that Performance Expectancy, (= 0.5398) (95% CI: 0.3052—0.7744), p < 0.0001; Effort Expectancy, (= 0.4846) (95% CI: 0.2695—0.6997), p < 0.0001; and Social Influence (= 0.2783) (95% CI: 0.0796—0.4770), p = 0.0061 are strong to moderate predictors of technology adoption; and Facilitating Conditions predict Use Behavior. The findings suggest that faculty need adequate support to ensure they adopt instructional technologies. Institutional policies and professional development initiatives should be designed to emphasize the practical benefits of a specific technology (PE), ensure both adequate training for digital literacy and selection of practical technologies (EE), and provide open and collaborative training environments with clear administrative expectations (SI). Additionally, the significance of robust infrastructure and support systems (FC) to actual use is made explicit. Addressing these factors can improve adoption among instructors, fostering innovation and enhancing the higher education learning experience. Future research should focus on the effect of moderating variables on technology adopting to reduce the heterogeneity found in the current study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Education & Information Technologies is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=187261669 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10639-025-13449-0 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 33 StartPage: 16687 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Higher education Type: general – SubjectFull: Adoption of ideas Type: general – SubjectFull: College teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Innovation adoption Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Acceptance Model Type: general – SubjectFull: Social influence Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessing the validity of utaut among higher education instructors: a meta-analysis. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Noureddine, Rasha – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Boote, David – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Campbell, Laurie O. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 15 M: 08 Text: Aug2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13602357 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 12 Titles: – TitleFull: Education & Information Technologies Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |