Citizens' perceptions of the legitimacy of independent agencies: The effects of expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority.
Saved in:
| Title: | Citizens' perceptions of the legitimacy of independent agencies: The effects of expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rimkutė, Dovilė1 (AUTHOR) d.rimkute@fgga.leidenuniv.nl, Mazepus, Honorata2 (AUTHOR) h.mazepus@uva.nl |
| Source: | Public Administration Review. Sep/Oct2025, Vol. 85 Issue 5, p1495-1511. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: | Reputation, Independent regulatory commissions, Citizen attitudes, Legitimacy of governments, Power (Social sciences), Public opinion polls, Rational-legal authority |
| Company/Entity: | European Food Safety Authority |
| Abstract: | Legitimacy is a central concern for independent agencies tasked with shaping policies. While expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority bases are assumed to be relevant for agency legitimacy, their individual and joint effects on citizens' perceptions lack comprehensive examination. To address this gap, the study integrates insights from bureaucratic politics, bureaucratic reputation, and cognitive psychology. Our survey experiment with Dutch citizens, focusing on the European Food Safety Authority, suggests that expertise‐based authority positively affects perceived agency legitimacy, while a negative reputation has detrimental effects. Furthermore, expertise‐based authority moderates the impact of reputation, amplifying positive effects and mitigating negative ones. This implies that agencies are more susceptible to reputational threats when they lack expertise‐based authority. The study advances the theoretical tenets of bureaucratic reputation theory and offers effective strategies for agencies to strengthen their legitimacy among the most critical audience in democratic political systems—citizens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 187618152 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Citizens' perceptions of the legitimacy of independent agencies: The effects of expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rimkutė%2C+Dovilė%22">Rimkutė, Dovilė</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> d.rimkute@fgga.leidenuniv.nl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mazepus%2C+Honorata%22">Mazepus, Honorata</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> h.mazepus@uva.nl</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Public+Administration+Review%22">Public Administration Review</searchLink>. Sep/Oct2025, Vol. 85 Issue 5, p1495-1511. 17p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reputation%22">Reputation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Independent+regulatory+commissions%22">Independent regulatory commissions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Citizen+attitudes%22">Citizen attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legitimacy+of+governments%22">Legitimacy of governments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Power+%28Social+sciences%29%22">Power (Social sciences)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+opinion+polls%22">Public opinion polls</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rational-legal+authority%22">Rational-legal authority</searchLink> – Name: SubjectCompany Label: Company/Entity Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22European+Food+Safety+Authority%22">European Food Safety Authority</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Legitimacy is a central concern for independent agencies tasked with shaping policies. While expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority bases are assumed to be relevant for agency legitimacy, their individual and joint effects on citizens' perceptions lack comprehensive examination. To address this gap, the study integrates insights from bureaucratic politics, bureaucratic reputation, and cognitive psychology. Our survey experiment with Dutch citizens, focusing on the European Food Safety Authority, suggests that expertise‐based authority positively affects perceived agency legitimacy, while a negative reputation has detrimental effects. Furthermore, expertise‐based authority moderates the impact of reputation, amplifying positive effects and mitigating negative ones. This implies that agencies are more susceptible to reputational threats when they lack expertise‐based authority. The study advances the theoretical tenets of bureaucratic reputation theory and offers effective strategies for agencies to strengthen their legitimacy among the most critical audience in democratic political systems—citizens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=187618152 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/puar.13916 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 1495 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Reputation Type: general – SubjectFull: Independent regulatory commissions Type: general – SubjectFull: Citizen attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Legitimacy of governments Type: general – SubjectFull: Power (Social sciences) Type: general – SubjectFull: Public opinion polls Type: general – SubjectFull: Rational-legal authority Type: general – SubjectFull: European Food Safety Authority Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Citizens' perceptions of the legitimacy of independent agencies: The effects of expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rimkutė, Dovilė – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mazepus, Honorata IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep/Oct2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00333352 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 85 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Public Administration Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
