Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Is Head Start Worth Saving? |
| Authors: |
VON HIPPEL, PAUL1,2, CHOR, ELISE3, LURIE, LEIB4 |
| Source: |
Education Next. Summer2025, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p22-31. 10p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Early childhood education, *Government policy, *Educational benefits, Poor families, Disinvestment, Pressure groups |
| Company/Entity: |
Head Start Program (U.S.) , Heritage Foundation (Washington, D.C.) |
| Reviews & Products: |
Project 2025 |
| Abstract: |
The article examines the debate surrounding the Head Start program, which is at risk of defunding as proposed by Project 2025, a recommendation from the Heritage Foundation. It argues that despite claims of ineffectiveness and safety issues, research indicates that Head Start provides significant short-term cognitive benefits and is generally safer for children than home environments, particularly for low-income families. The authors emphasize the need for a thorough analysis of the program's impact, citing evidence that suggests Head Start not only supports children's early education but also contributes to long-term positive outcomes for families. They advocate for maintaining and improving the program rather than eliminating it, highlighting the importance of evidence-based decision-making in public policy. [Extracted from the article] |
|
Copyright of Education Next is the property of Education Next Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
