What is "Dialogue" in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy.
Saved in:
| Title: | What is "Dialogue" in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Goñi, Julian Iñaki1 (AUTHOR) inaki.goni@ed.ac.uk |
| Source: | Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy. Sep2025, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p607-631. 25p. |
| Subject Terms: | Deliberative democracy, Political science, Deliberation, Human experimentation, Definitions |
| Abstract: | This article provides a narrative review on the concept of dialogue within STS and Deliberative Democracy academic literature. Through this review I find that dialogue has been used in unsystematic, conflicting and sometimes even misleading ways that conflate dialogue and deliberation. Dialogue is used flexibly as an epistemological standpoint, an interactional format, a tradition and format of public engagement, an interactional phenomenon and an idealised moment. I provide a characterisation and theorisation of dialogue that seeks to integrate critical and historical accounts of dialogue, while introducing analytical dimensions that can be leveraged for further research. By bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy, I advance a definition of dialogue as a public technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 187841852 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: What is "Dialogue" in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Goñi%2C+Julian+Iñaki%22">Goñi, Julian Iñaki</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> inaki.goni@ed.ac.uk</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Minerva%3A+A+Review+of+Science%2C+Learning+%26+Policy%22">Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy</searchLink>. Sep2025, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p607-631. 25p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deliberative+democracy%22">Deliberative democracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+science%22">Political science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deliberation%22">Deliberation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+experimentation%22">Human experimentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Definitions%22">Definitions</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article provides a narrative review on the concept of dialogue within STS and Deliberative Democracy academic literature. Through this review I find that dialogue has been used in unsystematic, conflicting and sometimes even misleading ways that conflate dialogue and deliberation. Dialogue is used flexibly as an epistemological standpoint, an interactional format, a tradition and format of public engagement, an interactional phenomenon and an idealised moment. I provide a characterisation and theorisation of dialogue that seeks to integrate critical and historical accounts of dialogue, while introducing analytical dimensions that can be leveraged for further research. By bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy, I advance a definition of dialogue as a public technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=187841852 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s11024-024-09551-1 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 607 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Deliberative democracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Political science Type: general – SubjectFull: Deliberation Type: general – SubjectFull: Human experimentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Definitions Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: What is "Dialogue" in Public Engagement with Science and Technology? Bridging STS and Deliberative Democracy. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Goñi, Julian Iñaki IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00264695 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 63 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
