Estimating Lung Volume During Cough: A Comparison of Respiratory Calibration Tasks and Methodologies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Estimating Lung Volume During Cough: A Comparison of Respiratory Calibration Tasks and Methodologies.
Authors: Borders, James C.1 bordersj@bu.edu, Huber, Jessica E.2, Troche, Michelle S.3
Source: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Sep2025, Vol. 68 Issue 9, p4290-4296. 7p.
Subject Terms: *Data analysis, *Movement disorders, *Experimental design, *Factor analysis, *Comparative studies, *Evaluation, Statistical power analysis, Plethysmography, Abdomen, Research funding, Disease duration, Spirometry, Cronbach's alpha, Respiration, Parkinson's disease, Descriptive statistics, Lung volume measurements, Statistics, Neuropsychological tests, Cough, Calibration, Airway (Anatomy), Confidence intervals
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: Purpose: Effective cough function requires sufficient respiratory support. To estimate lung volume, respiratory inductance plethysmography measures circumferential changes of the rib cage (RC) and abdomen (AB) during various behaviors, such as coughing. During speech breathing, the accuracy of these estimates is influenced by calibration tasks and analysis methods. Measurement error can introduce bias and confound results, yet the optimal approach for assessing lung volume during cough remains unclear. Method: Twenty participants with Parkinson's disease (Mage = 69 years; M disease duration = 11.39 years) completed three respiratory calibration tasks: (a) rest breathing, (b) cough-like breathing ("breathe in like you're going to cough, then breathe out forcefully without coughing"), and (c) single voluntary coughs ("cough hard one time"). Lung volume estimation error was calculated by comparing the estimated lung volume signal to the spirometry signal across tasks and task combinations. Error was also assessed across three analysis methods: the Banzett method (2:1 weighting for RC and AB) and two least squares methods--one correcting for both the RC and AB signals (LsqRC/AB) and another holding the AB constant (LsqRC). Results: Mean lung volume estimation error was 4.68% for LsqRC/AB, 9.88% for LsqRC, and 14.24% for the Banzett method. LsqRC/AB yielded significantly lower estimation error than both the LsqRC (p < .001, d = -1.14) and Banzett methods (p < .001, d = 1.69). Calibration task had no significant effect on estimation error (p = .889). Conclusions: The least squares method correcting for both the RC and AB (LsqRC/AB) provides the most precise lung volume estimates during cough. Error associated with the Banzett method exceeded previously reported values for speech breathing by more than 50%. Additional calibration tasks beyond rest breathing may not be necessary to meaningfully reduce lung volume error for cough measurement. Open Science Form: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29657360 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 187881685
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Estimating Lung Volume During Cough: A Comparison of Respiratory Calibration Tasks and Methodologies.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Borders%2C+James+C%2E%22&quot;&gt;Borders, James C.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;i&gt; bordersj@bu.edu&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Huber%2C+Jessica+E%2E%22&quot;&gt;Huber, Jessica E.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Troche%2C+Michelle+S%2E%22&quot;&gt;Troche, Michelle S.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Journal+of+Speech%2C+Language+%26+Hearing+Research%22&quot;&gt;Journal of Speech, Language &amp; Hearing Research&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Sep2025, Vol. 68 Issue 9, p4290-4296. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Data+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Data analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Movement+disorders%22&quot;&gt;Movement disorders&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Experimental+design%22&quot;&gt;Experimental design&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Factor+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Factor analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Comparative+studies%22&quot;&gt;Comparative studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Statistical+power+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Statistical power analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Plethysmography%22&quot;&gt;Plethysmography&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Abdomen%22&quot;&gt;Abdomen&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+funding%22&quot;&gt;Research funding&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Disease+duration%22&quot;&gt;Disease duration&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Spirometry%22&quot;&gt;Spirometry&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cronbach&#39;s+alpha%22&quot;&gt;Cronbach&#39;s alpha&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Respiration%22&quot;&gt;Respiration&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Parkinson&#39;s+disease%22&quot;&gt;Parkinson&#39;s disease&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Lung+volume+measurements%22&quot;&gt;Lung volume measurements&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Statistics%22&quot;&gt;Statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Neuropsychological+tests%22&quot;&gt;Neuropsychological tests&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cough%22&quot;&gt;Cough&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Calibration%22&quot;&gt;Calibration&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Airway+%28Anatomy%29%22&quot;&gt;Airway (Anatomy)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Confidence+intervals%22&quot;&gt;Confidence intervals&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22United+States%22&quot;&gt;United States&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: Effective cough function requires sufficient respiratory support. To estimate lung volume, respiratory inductance plethysmography measures circumferential changes of the rib cage (RC) and abdomen (AB) during various behaviors, such as coughing. During speech breathing, the accuracy of these estimates is influenced by calibration tasks and analysis methods. Measurement error can introduce bias and confound results, yet the optimal approach for assessing lung volume during cough remains unclear. Method: Twenty participants with Parkinson&#39;s disease (Mage = 69 years; M disease duration = 11.39 years) completed three respiratory calibration tasks: (a) rest breathing, (b) cough-like breathing (&quot;breathe in like you&#39;re going to cough, then breathe out forcefully without coughing&quot;), and (c) single voluntary coughs (&quot;cough hard one time&quot;). Lung volume estimation error was calculated by comparing the estimated lung volume signal to the spirometry signal across tasks and task combinations. Error was also assessed across three analysis methods: the Banzett method (2:1 weighting for RC and AB) and two least squares methods--one correcting for both the RC and AB signals (LsqRC/AB) and another holding the AB constant (LsqRC). Results: Mean lung volume estimation error was 4.68% for LsqRC/AB, 9.88% for LsqRC, and 14.24% for the Banzett method. LsqRC/AB yielded significantly lower estimation error than both the LsqRC (p &lt; .001, d = -1.14) and Banzett methods (p &lt; .001, d = 1.69). Calibration task had no significant effect on estimation error (p = .889). Conclusions: The least squares method correcting for both the RC and AB (LsqRC/AB) provides the most precise lung volume estimates during cough. Error associated with the Banzett method exceeded previously reported values for speech breathing by more than 50%. Additional calibration tasks beyond rest breathing may not be necessary to meaningfully reduce lung volume error for cough measurement. Open Science Form: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29657360 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language &amp; Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=187881685
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00237
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 4290
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Movement disorders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical power analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Plethysmography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Abdomen
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disease duration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spirometry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cronbach's alpha
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Respiration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parkinson's disease
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lung volume measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Neuropsychological tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cough
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Calibration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Airway (Anatomy)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Estimating Lung Volume During Cough: A Comparison of Respiratory Calibration Tasks and Methodologies.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Borders, James C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huber, Jessica E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Troche, Michelle S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10924388
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 68
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1