On (Conflating) Predatory Journals and Compromised Research Practices: Presenting the Tool 'Compass to Publish' and the (Im)possible Scalability Debate.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: On (Conflating) Predatory Journals and Compromised Research Practices: Presenting the Tool 'Compass to Publish' and the (Im)possible Scalability Debate.
Authors: Dony, Christophe1 cdony@uliege.be
Source: Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences. 2025, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p63-69. 7p.
Subject Terms: *Article processing charges (Open access publishing), *Information literacy, Predatory publishing, Open access publishing, Research ethics, Standards, Scalability
Abstract: This commentary critically presents and discusses some of the information-literacy and pedagogical principles underlying the development of 'Compass to Publish', a free online tool which helps users determine the possible predatory nature of open access journals requiring or hiding article processing charges (APCs). It then moves on to discuss the limits of the tool in terms of scalability possibilities based on user feedback. Finally, the commentary shares critical observations regarding the difficulties for future developments of the tool as they can relate to compromised research practices such as paper mill activity, authorship for sale, or fake peer review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences is the property of Canadian Association for Information Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 188375264
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: On (Conflating) Predatory Journals and Compromised Research Practices: Presenting the Tool 'Compass to Publish' and the (Im)possible Scalability Debate.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dony%2C+Christophe%22">Dony, Christophe</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> cdony@uliege.be</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Canadian+Journal+of+Information+%26+Library+Sciences%22">Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences</searchLink>. 2025, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p63-69. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Article+processing+charges+%28Open+access+publishing%29%22">Article processing charges (Open access publishing)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+literacy%22">Information literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predatory+publishing%22">Predatory publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Open+access+publishing%22">Open access publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+ethics%22">Research ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scalability%22">Scalability</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This commentary critically presents and discusses some of the information-literacy and pedagogical principles underlying the development of 'Compass to Publish', a free online tool which helps users determine the possible predatory nature of open access journals requiring or hiding article processing charges (APCs). It then moves on to discuss the limits of the tool in terms of scalability possibilities based on user feedback. Finally, the commentary shares critical observations regarding the difficulties for future developments of the tool as they can relate to compromised research practices such as paper mill activity, authorship for sale, or fake peer review. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences is the property of Canadian Association for Information Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=188375264
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.5206/cjils-rcsib.v48i1.22212
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 63
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Article processing charges (Open access publishing)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Predatory publishing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Open access publishing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Standards
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scalability
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: On (Conflating) Predatory Journals and Compromised Research Practices: Presenting the Tool 'Compass to Publish' and the (Im)possible Scalability Debate.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dony, Christophe
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1195096X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 48
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences
              Type: main
ResultId 1