View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The dark side of affinity spaces for teacher professional learning.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The dark side of affinity spaces for teacher professional learning.
Authors: Krutka, Daniel G.1 (AUTHOR) dankrutka@gmail.com, Greenhalgh, Spencer P.2 (AUTHOR)
Source: British Journal of Educational Technology. Nov2025, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p2573-2594. 22p.
Subject Terms: *Social media, *Teacher development, Partisanship, Social groups, Virtual communities, Forums, Political agenda
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: The affinity space framework has proven useful for explaining and understanding teacher activity on social media platforms. In this study, we explore the 'dark side' of teacher affinity spaces by documenting a partisan teachers' group on an alternative social media platform. We used a mix of a priori and emergent coding to analyse screenshots of posts and comments from a public teachers' group and group administrators' activity on the broader platform. Findings indicate that although the group administrators began with a focus on teachers, most participants were non‐teachers with political (rather than professional) concerns about US education. Furthermore, administrators both freely engaged with political talking points in their activity outside the teachers' group and allowed the broader platform culture—including conspiratorial thinking, explicit racism and out‐group villainization—to seep in. We conclude by describing how these findings correspond with the key characteristics of an affinity space, including an overlapping of affinities, a lack of concern for professional qualifications, and influence from the broader platform. These findings provide an illustrative example of how teacher affinity spaces can drift from their stated intention within the larger platform context. Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Social media spaces have been conceptualized as affinity spaces for educators.Most studies provide optimistic accounts of teacher professional learning on social media.Most research has analysed teachers' use of mainstream platforms.What this paper adds We offer a detailed analysis of a partisan US teacher group on an alternative platform.Initial efforts to focus on teaching devolved into in‐group identification and out‐group villainization.This study highlights how the characteristics of affinity spaces can be detrimental to teacher professional learning.Implications for practice and/or policy Administrators of online groups should recognize their important role in ensuring group purposes are enacted.Educators should assess whether the larger platform is conducive to cultivating affinity around the group's aims.Scholars and educators should consider that the characteristics of affinity spaces can be either positive or negative for teacher professional learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Educational Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 188606185
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The dark side of affinity spaces for teacher professional learning.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Krutka%2C+Daniel+G%2E%22">Krutka, Daniel G.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> dankrutka@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Greenhalgh%2C+Spencer+P%2E%22">Greenhalgh, Spencer P.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Educational+Technology%22">British Journal of Educational Technology</searchLink>. Nov2025, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p2573-2594. 22p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+media%22">Social media</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+development%22">Teacher development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Partisanship%22">Partisanship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+groups%22">Social groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Virtual+communities%22">Virtual communities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Forums%22">Forums</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+agenda%22">Political agenda</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The affinity space framework has proven useful for explaining and understanding teacher activity on social media platforms. In this study, we explore the 'dark side' of teacher affinity spaces by documenting a partisan teachers' group on an alternative social media platform. We used a mix of a priori and emergent coding to analyse screenshots of posts and comments from a public teachers' group and group administrators' activity on the broader platform. Findings indicate that although the group administrators began with a focus on teachers, most participants were non‐teachers with political (rather than professional) concerns about US education. Furthermore, administrators both freely engaged with political talking points in their activity outside the teachers' group and allowed the broader platform culture—including conspiratorial thinking, explicit racism and out‐group villainization—to seep in. We conclude by describing how these findings correspond with the key characteristics of an affinity space, including an overlapping of affinities, a lack of concern for professional qualifications, and influence from the broader platform. These findings provide an illustrative example of how teacher affinity spaces can drift from their stated intention within the larger platform context. Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Social media spaces have been conceptualized as affinity spaces for educators.Most studies provide optimistic accounts of teacher professional learning on social media.Most research has analysed teachers' use of mainstream platforms.What this paper adds We offer a detailed analysis of a partisan US teacher group on an alternative platform.Initial efforts to focus on teaching devolved into in‐group identification and out‐group villainization.This study highlights how the characteristics of affinity spaces can be detrimental to teacher professional learning.Implications for practice and/or policy Administrators of online groups should recognize their important role in ensuring group purposes are enacted.Educators should assess whether the larger platform is conducive to cultivating affinity around the group's aims.Scholars and educators should consider that the characteristics of affinity spaces can be either positive or negative for teacher professional learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Educational Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=188606185
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/bjet.13593
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 2573
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Social media
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Partisanship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Virtual communities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Forums
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Political agenda
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The dark side of affinity spaces for teacher professional learning.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Krutka, Daniel G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Greenhalgh, Spencer P.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00071013
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 56
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: British Journal of Educational Technology
              Type: main
ResultId 1