View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Joint Physical Custody and Children's Physical and Mental Health.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Joint Physical Custody and Children's Physical and Mental Health.
Authors: Riser, Quentin H.1 (AUTHOR) qriser@wisc.edu
Source: Child & Youth Care Forum. Dec2025, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p1305-1335. 31p.
Subject Terms: *Mothers, *Families, *Custody of children, *Children, Competency assessment (Law), Health status indicators, Marriage, Income, Research funding, Probability theory, Interviewing, Logistic regression analysis, Descriptive statistics, Multivariate analysis, Surveys, Divorce, Data analysis software, Co-parents, Regression analysis
Geographic Terms: Wisconsin
Abstract: Background: This study examines the effects of joint physical custody (JPC) on the physical and mental health of children following divorce, using comprehensive survey data from Wisconsin. Objective: Informed by Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological model, the study seeks to understand the impact of custody arrangements on children's health outcomes post-divorce. Prior research has suggested potential benefits of JPC, but there is a need for more robust analysis to control for selection biases and other confounding factors. Method: The analytic sample is constructed to facilitate comparisons between mothers with shared versus sole placement. The parents in the Wisconsin data are included in the analytic sample based on survey measures reflecting the focal child's actual placement arrangement at the time of the survey. The final data include 374 parents consisting of 170 sole-placement mothers and 204 shared placement mothers. This study employs robust probit regression models and Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) to account for selection biases. Descriptive statistics and multivariate models are used to analyze survey data collected from Wisconsin. The analytic approach ensures methodological rigor by adjusting for potential confounders and providing a more accurate estimate of the relationships under investigation. Results: The findings reveal that children in JPC arrangements exhibit significantly better mental health outcomes compared to those in sole custody. Specifically, 79.8% of children in JPC reported good mental health versus 67.9% in sole custody. Multivariate probit and IPW models corroborated these results. High-quality co-parenting relationships, more prevalent in JPC scenarios, were not clearly linked to these improved outcomes. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of nuanced policy approaches that consider individual family contexts and parental relationship quality. The findings raise questions concerning the need for interventions like co-parenting workshops to promote effective communication and collaboration between divorced parents. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of custody arrangements on children's well-being and to inform evidence-based policy decisions. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how JPC and co-parenting quality influence children's mental and physical health post-divorce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Child & Youth Care Forum is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 188798529
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Joint Physical Custody and Children's Physical and Mental Health.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Riser%2C+Quentin+H%2E%22">Riser, Quentin H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> qriser@wisc.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Child+%26+Youth+Care+Forum%22">Child & Youth Care Forum</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p1305-1335. 31p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mothers%22">Mothers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Families%22">Families</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Custody+of+children%22">Custody of children</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competency+assessment+%28Law%29%22">Competency assessment (Law)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+status+indicators%22">Health status indicators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marriage%22">Marriage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Income%22">Income</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logistic+regression+analysis%22">Logistic regression analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Divorce%22">Divorce</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Co-parents%22">Co-parents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Wisconsin%22">Wisconsin</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: This study examines the effects of joint physical custody (JPC) on the physical and mental health of children following divorce, using comprehensive survey data from Wisconsin. Objective: Informed by Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological model, the study seeks to understand the impact of custody arrangements on children's health outcomes post-divorce. Prior research has suggested potential benefits of JPC, but there is a need for more robust analysis to control for selection biases and other confounding factors. Method: The analytic sample is constructed to facilitate comparisons between mothers with shared versus sole placement. The parents in the Wisconsin data are included in the analytic sample based on survey measures reflecting the focal child's actual placement arrangement at the time of the survey. The final data include 374 parents consisting of 170 sole-placement mothers and 204 shared placement mothers. This study employs robust probit regression models and Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) to account for selection biases. Descriptive statistics and multivariate models are used to analyze survey data collected from Wisconsin. The analytic approach ensures methodological rigor by adjusting for potential confounders and providing a more accurate estimate of the relationships under investigation. Results: The findings reveal that children in JPC arrangements exhibit significantly better mental health outcomes compared to those in sole custody. Specifically, 79.8% of children in JPC reported good mental health versus 67.9% in sole custody. Multivariate probit and IPW models corroborated these results. High-quality co-parenting relationships, more prevalent in JPC scenarios, were not clearly linked to these improved outcomes. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of nuanced policy approaches that consider individual family contexts and parental relationship quality. The findings raise questions concerning the need for interventions like co-parenting workshops to promote effective communication and collaboration between divorced parents. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of custody arrangements on children's well-being and to inform evidence-based policy decisions. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of how JPC and co-parenting quality influence children's mental and physical health post-divorce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Child & Youth Care Forum is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=188798529
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10566-025-09863-7
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 31
        StartPage: 1305
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Mothers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Families
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Custody of children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Competency assessment (Law)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health status indicators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Marriage
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Income
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probability theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Logistic regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Divorce
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Co-parents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Wisconsin
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Joint Physical Custody and Children's Physical and Mental Health.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Riser, Quentin H.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10531890
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 54
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Child & Youth Care Forum
              Type: main
ResultId 1