Sex and racial bias in medical student EPA assessments: Findings and hypotheses for bias mitigation targets.
Saved in:
| Title: | Sex and racial bias in medical student EPA assessments: Findings and hypotheses for bias mitigation targets. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Card, Dan1 (AUTHOR), McPherson, Lauren2 (AUTHOR), Marka, Nicholas3 (AUTHOR), Langworthy, Benjamin4 (AUTHOR), Mustapha, Taj5 (AUTHOR), Violato, Claudio6 (AUTHOR), Englander, Robert7 (AUTHOR), Poeppelman, Rachel Stork5 (AUTHOR) poepp036@umn.edu |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Nov2025, Vol. 47 Issue 11, p1815-1824. 10p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Qualitative research, *Educational tests & measurements, *Education research, *Medical students, *Clinical competence, *Medical schools, *Communication, *Outcome-based education, Sexism, Supervision of employees, Research funding, Work environment, Descriptive statistics, Racism, Odds ratio, Implicit bias, Medical coding, Medicine, Data analysis software, Sentiment analysis, Minorities, Regression analysis |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Despite extensive documentation of implicit bias across traditional medical education assessments, no studies have examined bias in Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-based assessments of medical students. This gap threatens both assessment validity and advancement of diverse trainees, as even small inequities can significantly impact career trajectories for underrepresented students. As such, we sought to detect implicit sex and racial bias in EPA-based assessments of medical students. Methods: We examined 17,061 EPA-based assessments of 279 third year medical students for evidence of sex or racial bias. We examined EPA assessment comments for an association between race/sex and comment length, sentiment, or the use of keywords associated with implicit bias. We also tested for an association between race/sex and entrustment scale rating. Additionally, three authors qualitatively coded 6% (n = 1069) of narrative comments for 'feedback value' and tested for an association with race/sex. Results: There was no significant difference in comment length, feedback value, sentiment, or use of keywords previously associated with bias by student sex/race. Students who identify as white were more likely to receive a higher entrustment rating than non-whites, but no sex differences were noted in entrustment ratings. Discussion: Although we did not detect sex or racial bias in EPA-based narrative assessments, we did find evidence of racial bias in entrustment scale ratings. Following these results, we consider whether EPA-based assessments are less prone to implicit bias and identify targets for future research seeking to mitigate implicit bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 188805007 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Sex and racial bias in medical student EPA assessments: Findings and hypotheses for bias mitigation targets. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Card%2C+Dan%22">Card, Dan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McPherson%2C+Lauren%22">McPherson, Lauren</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marka%2C+Nicholas%22">Marka, Nicholas</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Langworthy%2C+Benjamin%22">Langworthy, Benjamin</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mustapha%2C+Taj%22">Mustapha, Taj</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Violato%2C+Claudio%22">Violato, Claudio</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Englander%2C+Robert%22">Englander, Robert</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Poeppelman%2C+Rachel+Stork%22">Poeppelman, Rachel Stork</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> poepp036@umn.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Nov2025, Vol. 47 Issue 11, p1815-1824. 10p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+research%22">Education research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+students%22">Medical students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+competence%22">Clinical competence</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+schools%22">Medical schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcome-based+education%22">Outcome-based education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sexism%22">Sexism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supervision+of+employees%22">Supervision of employees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+environment%22">Work environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racism%22">Racism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Odds+ratio%22">Odds ratio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Implicit+bias%22">Implicit bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+coding%22">Medical coding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medicine%22">Medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sentiment+analysis%22">Sentiment analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minorities%22">Minorities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Introduction: Despite extensive documentation of implicit bias across traditional medical education assessments, no studies have examined bias in Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-based assessments of medical students. This gap threatens both assessment validity and advancement of diverse trainees, as even small inequities can significantly impact career trajectories for underrepresented students. As such, we sought to detect implicit sex and racial bias in EPA-based assessments of medical students. Methods: We examined 17,061 EPA-based assessments of 279 third year medical students for evidence of sex or racial bias. We examined EPA assessment comments for an association between race/sex and comment length, sentiment, or the use of keywords associated with implicit bias. We also tested for an association between race/sex and entrustment scale rating. Additionally, three authors qualitatively coded 6% (n = 1069) of narrative comments for 'feedback value' and tested for an association with race/sex. Results: There was no significant difference in comment length, feedback value, sentiment, or use of keywords previously associated with bias by student sex/race. Students who identify as white were more likely to receive a higher entrustment rating than non-whites, but no sex differences were noted in entrustment ratings. Discussion: Although we did not detect sex or racial bias in EPA-based narrative assessments, we did find evidence of racial bias in entrustment scale ratings. Following these results, we consider whether EPA-based assessments are less prone to implicit bias and identify targets for future research seeking to mitigate implicit bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=188805007 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2025.2502162 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 1815 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Qualitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements Type: general – SubjectFull: Education research Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical students Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcome-based education Type: general – SubjectFull: Sexism Type: general – SubjectFull: Supervision of employees Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Work environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Racism Type: general – SubjectFull: Odds ratio Type: general – SubjectFull: Implicit bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical coding Type: general – SubjectFull: Medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Sentiment analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Minorities Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Sex and racial bias in medical student EPA assessments: Findings and hypotheses for bias mitigation targets. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Card, Dan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McPherson, Lauren – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Marka, Nicholas – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Langworthy, Benjamin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mustapha, Taj – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Violato, Claudio – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Englander, Robert – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Poeppelman, Rachel Stork IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0142159X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 47 – Type: issue Value: 11 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Teacher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |