Desarrollo de encuestas fiables para la evaluación de la motivación y la utilidad del aprendizaje basado en retos reales.
Saved in:
| Title: | Desarrollo de encuestas fiables para la evaluación de la motivación y la utilidad del aprendizaje basado en retos reales. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Development of Reliable Surveys for Assessing Motivation and the Usefulness of Real-world Challenge-based Learning. |
| Authors: | Castells-Molina, Anna1,2,3 anna.castells@cosesquemolen.cat, Sanchez-Grau, Jordi1 jsanchezgr@tecnocampus.cat, García-Fresneda, Adrián1 agraciaf@tecnocampus.cat, Busquets Faciabén, Albert2 albert.busquets@gencat.cat |
| Source: | Comunicar. 2025, Vol. 33 Issue 83, p37-51. 15p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Motivation (Psychology), *Educational outcomes, *Problem-based learning, *Science education, Statistical reliability, Sports sciences, Social surveys, Model validation |
| Abstract (English): | The objective of this study was to create, validate and demonstrate the reliability of surveys that assessed motivation, perception of learning and perception of the usefulness of the real-world challenge-based learning methodology (RWCBL) after his implementation in Sport and Exercise Sciences (SES) to examine whether teachers’ perception of its educational benefits aligns with of the other agents involved: university students (EU), school and high school teachers (PE) and their students (AE). The analysis of these variables within the RWCBL methodology constitutes the only means of comprehensively understanding the perceptions of these three key agents involved in it. The development of these surveys is warranted in SES for two primary reasons: (1) the literature review only provides validated but not reliability surveys and (2) integrate three key constructs from the domains of education and psychology. The validation of the surveys was carried out by twelve experts, and to establish their reliability, test-retests were conducted with EU and PE from the educational entities using Pearson’s χ2 statistical comparison by questions and topics. The validation results yielded three surveys: for EU (18 questions), for PE (28 questions) and AE (16 questions). All surveys consisted of Likert-type and open-ended questions. The development of the methodology to assess the reliability of the surveys was carried out throughout a course. First, the schools proposed the challenges; then the EU prepare their game proposals to solve the challenge, and finally, AE participated in the game. The χ2 results showed good reliability (p ≥ 0.05). The study demonstrated the validity of content and structure of surveys, as well as good reliability for analysing motivation, perception of learning and usefulness in RWCBL from the perspective of university students, teachers from educational entities and their students. Therefore, exhibited sufficient rigor and provided data from the different stakeholders involved, allowing for the possibility of being used to analyse subjects where the same methodology or in other active methodologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | El objetivo del estudio fue crear, validar y demostrar la fiabilidad de encuestas que valorasen la motivación, la percepción del aprendizaje y de la utilidad de la metodología del aprendizaje basado en retos reales (ABRR) en el grado universitario de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (CAFyD) para poder comprobar si la percepción que tienen los docentes de sus beneficios educativos se corresponde con la que tienen los distintos agentes implicados en ella: estudiantes universitarios (EU), profesorado de escuelas e institutos (PE) y su alumnado (AE). El análisis de estas variables en la metodología del ABRR en es el único que posibilita conocer la percepción de estos tres agentes involucrados en el proceso. La creación de estas encuestas es necesaria en CAFyD por dos motivos: (1) la revisión de la literatura solo ofrece encuestas validadas pero no fiables y (2) permitían relacionan tres conceptos del ámbito de la educación y la psicología. La validación la realizaron doce expertos y para establecer su fiabilidad se realizaron test-retests a los EU y al PE aplicando la comparación estadística χ2 de Pearson por preguntas y temas. Los resultados de la validación fueron tres encuestas: para los EU (18 preguntas), para el PE (28 preguntas) y para AE (16 preguntas). Todas fueron conformadas por preguntas tipo likert y abiertas. El desarrollo de la metodología para comprobar la fiabilidad de las encuestas se llevo a cabo a lo largo del curso de una asignatura. Primero, lo centros educativos propusieron los retos, después los EU hicieron las propuestas para resolverlos y finalmente los implementaron con los AE. Los resultados del χ2 mostraron buena fiabilidad (p ≥ 0,05). El estudio demostró su validez con relación al contenido y estructura, así como buena fiabilidad para analizar la motivación, la percepción del aprendizaje y la utilidad del ABRR desde la perspectiva de los EU, los PE y su alumnado. Puesto que mostraron rigurosidad suficiente, permitían obtener datos de los diferentes agentes implicados en el proceso y la posibilidad utilizarlas para analizar materias en que se aplicara esta metodología u otras metodologías activas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Comunicar is the property of Oxbridge Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 189019131 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Desarrollo de encuestas fiables para la evaluación de la motivación y la utilidad del aprendizaje basado en retos reales. – Name: TitleAlt Label: Alternate Title Group: TiAlt Data: Development of Reliable Surveys for Assessing Motivation and the Usefulness of Real-world Challenge-based Learning. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Castells-Molina%2C+Anna%22">Castells-Molina, Anna</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo><i> anna.castells@cosesquemolen.cat</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sanchez-Grau%2C+Jordi%22">Sanchez-Grau, Jordi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> jsanchezgr@tecnocampus.cat</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22García-Fresneda%2C+Adrián%22">García-Fresneda, Adrián</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> agraciaf@tecnocampus.cat</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Busquets+Faciabén%2C+Albert%22">Busquets Faciabén, Albert</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> albert.busquets@gencat.cat</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Comunicar%22">Comunicar</searchLink>. 2025, Vol. 33 Issue 83, p37-51. 15p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem-based+learning%22">Problem-based learning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+education%22">Science education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sports+sciences%22">Sports sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+surveys%22">Social surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Model+validation%22">Model validation</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: The objective of this study was to create, validate and demonstrate the reliability of surveys that assessed motivation, perception of learning and perception of the usefulness of the real-world challenge-based learning methodology (RWCBL) after his implementation in Sport and Exercise Sciences (SES) to examine whether teachers’ perception of its educational benefits aligns with of the other agents involved: university students (EU), school and high school teachers (PE) and their students (AE). The analysis of these variables within the RWCBL methodology constitutes the only means of comprehensively understanding the perceptions of these three key agents involved in it. The development of these surveys is warranted in SES for two primary reasons: (1) the literature review only provides validated but not reliability surveys and (2) integrate three key constructs from the domains of education and psychology. The validation of the surveys was carried out by twelve experts, and to establish their reliability, test-retests were conducted with EU and PE from the educational entities using Pearson’s χ2 statistical comparison by questions and topics. The validation results yielded three surveys: for EU (18 questions), for PE (28 questions) and AE (16 questions). All surveys consisted of Likert-type and open-ended questions. The development of the methodology to assess the reliability of the surveys was carried out throughout a course. First, the schools proposed the challenges; then the EU prepare their game proposals to solve the challenge, and finally, AE participated in the game. The χ2 results showed good reliability (p ≥ 0.05). The study demonstrated the validity of content and structure of surveys, as well as good reliability for analysing motivation, perception of learning and usefulness in RWCBL from the perspective of university students, teachers from educational entities and their students. Therefore, exhibited sufficient rigor and provided data from the different stakeholders involved, allowing for the possibility of being used to analyse subjects where the same methodology or in other active methodologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (Spanish) Group: Ab Data: El objetivo del estudio fue crear, validar y demostrar la fiabilidad de encuestas que valorasen la motivación, la percepción del aprendizaje y de la utilidad de la metodología del aprendizaje basado en retos reales (ABRR) en el grado universitario de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte (CAFyD) para poder comprobar si la percepción que tienen los docentes de sus beneficios educativos se corresponde con la que tienen los distintos agentes implicados en ella: estudiantes universitarios (EU), profesorado de escuelas e institutos (PE) y su alumnado (AE). El análisis de estas variables en la metodología del ABRR en es el único que posibilita conocer la percepción de estos tres agentes involucrados en el proceso. La creación de estas encuestas es necesaria en CAFyD por dos motivos: (1) la revisión de la literatura solo ofrece encuestas validadas pero no fiables y (2) permitían relacionan tres conceptos del ámbito de la educación y la psicología. La validación la realizaron doce expertos y para establecer su fiabilidad se realizaron test-retests a los EU y al PE aplicando la comparación estadística χ2 de Pearson por preguntas y temas. Los resultados de la validación fueron tres encuestas: para los EU (18 preguntas), para el PE (28 preguntas) y para AE (16 preguntas). Todas fueron conformadas por preguntas tipo likert y abiertas. El desarrollo de la metodología para comprobar la fiabilidad de las encuestas se llevo a cabo a lo largo del curso de una asignatura. Primero, lo centros educativos propusieron los retos, después los EU hicieron las propuestas para resolverlos y finalmente los implementaron con los AE. Los resultados del χ2 mostraron buena fiabilidad (p ≥ 0,05). El estudio demostró su validez con relación al contenido y estructura, así como buena fiabilidad para analizar la motivación, la percepción del aprendizaje y la utilidad del ABRR desde la perspectiva de los EU, los PE y su alumnado. Puesto que mostraron rigurosidad suficiente, permitían obtener datos de los diferentes agentes implicados en el proceso y la posibilidad utilizarlas para analizar materias en que se aplicara esta metodología u otras metodologías activas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Comunicar is the property of Oxbridge Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=189019131 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.5281/zenodo.17404448 Languages: – Code: spa Text: Spanish PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 37 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem-based learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Science education Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Sports sciences Type: general – SubjectFull: Social surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Model validation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Desarrollo de encuestas fiables para la evaluación de la motivación y la utilidad del aprendizaje basado en retos reales. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Castells-Molina, Anna – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sanchez-Grau, Jordi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: García-Fresneda, Adrián – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Busquets Faciabén, Albert IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: 2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 11343478 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 33 – Type: issue Value: 83 Titles: – TitleFull: Comunicar Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
