Minding the gender gap in advanced STEM courses: effects of student preparedness and activity level.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Minding the gender gap in advanced STEM courses: effects of student preparedness and activity level.
Authors: Ram, Ilana1 (AUTHOR) ilana.ram@technion.ac.il, Shwartz, Adam2 (AUTHOR), Roll, Ido1,3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Instructional Science. Dec2025, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p1457-1478. 22p.
Subject Terms: *STEM education, *Learning readiness, *Gender inequality, *Engineering students, *Mathematics education, *Higher education, *Educational evaluation, Participation
Abstract: The gender achievement gap in higher STEM education is well documented as STEM course grades often show a bias favoring men, even when controlling for overall student achievements. The current work, which was preregistered prior to data collection, replicates and extends prior work to evaluate several possible contributors to the gender gap in advanced STEM courses. The contributing factors include students' STEM-preparedness, learning assessment design, and students' activity level in the course. We analyzed the data of a cohort of 315 undergraduate engineering students in a leading technological university in Israel. A mixed-effect model analysis revealed a gender gap in both high-stakes and low-stakes assessments of learning. We found that the gap first appears in lower-division undergraduate mathematics courses and remains steady through advanced STEM courses, with relatively little variance between different courses. We further found that students' activity in the course's learning management system is not associated with a gap reduction. The analysis suggests that the gender gap can be traced back, at least in part, to students' STEM-preparedness when entering college. Notably, although the gap is traced prior to college, high-school grades likely show a ceiling effect and are thus not representative of the gap shown later in college. Therefore, it may be that other preparatory factors contribute to this gap, outside of or in addition to high-school performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Instructional Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 189211917
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Minding the gender gap in advanced STEM courses: effects of student preparedness and activity level.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ram%2C+Ilana%22">Ram, Ilana</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ilana.ram@technion.ac.il</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shwartz%2C+Adam%22">Shwartz, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roll%2C+Ido%22">Roll, Ido</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Instructional+Science%22">Instructional Science</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p1457-1478. 22p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+education%22">STEM education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+readiness%22">Learning readiness</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+inequality%22">Gender inequality</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+students%22">Engineering students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+education%22">Mathematics education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+evaluation%22">Educational evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Participation%22">Participation</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The gender achievement gap in higher STEM education is well documented as STEM course grades often show a bias favoring men, even when controlling for overall student achievements. The current work, which was preregistered prior to data collection, replicates and extends prior work to evaluate several possible contributors to the gender gap in advanced STEM courses. The contributing factors include students' STEM-preparedness, learning assessment design, and students' activity level in the course. We analyzed the data of a cohort of 315 undergraduate engineering students in a leading technological university in Israel. A mixed-effect model analysis revealed a gender gap in both high-stakes and low-stakes assessments of learning. We found that the gap first appears in lower-division undergraduate mathematics courses and remains steady through advanced STEM courses, with relatively little variance between different courses. We further found that students' activity in the course's learning management system is not associated with a gap reduction. The analysis suggests that the gender gap can be traced back, at least in part, to students' STEM-preparedness when entering college. Notably, although the gap is traced prior to college, high-school grades likely show a ceiling effect and are thus not representative of the gap shown later in college. Therefore, it may be that other preparatory factors contribute to this gap, outside of or in addition to high-school performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Instructional Science is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=189211917
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11251-025-09748-1
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 1457
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: STEM education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning readiness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender inequality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Participation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Minding the gender gap in advanced STEM courses: effects of student preparedness and activity level.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ram, Ilana
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shwartz, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roll, Ido
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00204277
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Instructional Science
              Type: main
ResultId 1