View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

A Rubric for Microcredential Evaluation: Strengthening Quality Assurance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Rubric for Microcredential Evaluation: Strengthening Quality Assurance.
Authors: Sullivan, Collin1 (AUTHOR) collinsullivan@umbc.edu
Source: Innovative Higher Education. Dec2025, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p2067-2091. 25p.
Subject Terms: *Digital badges in education, *Higher education, *Educational quality, *Educational equalization, *Scoring rubrics
Abstract: As microcredentials proliferate across higher education, questions of quality, equity, and trust remain central. This paper presents a case study from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), highlighting the development of an institutional governance model and evaluation framework to ensure the integrity of its microcredential portfolio. Drawing on national frameworks such as 1EdTech (2024), Quality Matters (2023), and Harrison and Williams (2024), UMBC created a microcredential taxonomy and a twelve-criterion evaluation rubric, which is used by its Microcredential Review Board (MRB) to assess all proposals. These efforts are supported by the Microcredential Advisory Committee (MAC), which provides strategic guidance to ensure relevance and alignment with learner and employer needs. The paper details how these structures work together to foster consistency, transparency, and institutional trust, and reflects on key lessons learned through implementation. UMBC's experience offers practical strategies for other institutions seeking to operationalize microcredential quality assurance in scalable, equity-minded ways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Innovative Higher Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 189417209
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A Rubric for Microcredential Evaluation: Strengthening Quality Assurance.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sullivan%2C+Collin%22">Sullivan, Collin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> collinsullivan@umbc.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Innovative+Higher+Education%22">Innovative Higher Education</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p2067-2091. 25p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+badges+in+education%22">Digital badges in education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+quality%22">Educational quality</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+equalization%22">Educational equalization</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+rubrics%22">Scoring rubrics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: As microcredentials proliferate across higher education, questions of quality, equity, and trust remain central. This paper presents a case study from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), highlighting the development of an institutional governance model and evaluation framework to ensure the integrity of its microcredential portfolio. Drawing on national frameworks such as 1EdTech (2024), Quality Matters (2023), and Harrison and Williams (2024), UMBC created a microcredential taxonomy and a twelve-criterion evaluation rubric, which is used by its Microcredential Review Board (MRB) to assess all proposals. These efforts are supported by the Microcredential Advisory Committee (MAC), which provides strategic guidance to ensure relevance and alignment with learner and employer needs. The paper details how these structures work together to foster consistency, transparency, and institutional trust, and reflects on key lessons learned through implementation. UMBC's experience offers practical strategies for other institutions seeking to operationalize microcredential quality assurance in scalable, equity-minded ways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Innovative Higher Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=189417209
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10755-025-09817-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 25
        StartPage: 2067
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Digital badges in education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational quality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational equalization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scoring rubrics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A Rubric for Microcredential Evaluation: Strengthening Quality Assurance.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sullivan, Collin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07425627
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Innovative Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1