View in EDS PDF Full Text

Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling.
Authors: Weinstein, Hannah N. W.1, Tucker, Lauren H.1, Fernandez, Karla Y.1, Galatioto, Jessica A.1, Golub, Justin S.1 justin.golub@columbia.edu
Source: American Journal of Audiology. Dec2025, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1013-1018. 6p.
Subject Terms: *Auditory perception testing, *Academic medical centers, *Retrospective studies, *Hearing disorders, Professional practice, Research funding, Hearing aids, Medical appointments, Medical records, Acquisition of data, Audiologists, Data analysis software, Psychosocial factors, Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
Company/Entity: United States. Food & Drug Administration
Abstract: Purpose: In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids nationwide. The impact on audiology practice has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study is to determine if there was a change in the volume of hearing aid evaluations (HAEs) and comprehensive audiologic exams (CAEs) at an academic tertiary care audiology practice following the ruling. Method: Data were collected from the billing records of patients ≥ 18 years old. HAE and CAE visits, defined by Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, were included. The number of visits was totaled for equal time periods (534 days) before and after October 17, 2022, when OTC hearing aid sales began. Sensitivity analysis (365 days before and after the ruling) accounted for seasonality. Change in visits per day over the entire period was calculated from the slope of the line of best fit. Results: The mean (SD) age was 60.5 (18.3) years. There were 20,300 combined HAE and CAE visits. Compared to before the ruling, over the entire study period (534 days), HAE visits increased by 12.0% (n = 57), CAE visits increased by 7.3% (n = 685), and combined visits (HAE and CAE) increased by 7.6% (n = 744) after the ruling. Over the entire study period (534 days), HAE had an increase of 0.084 visits/day, CAE had an increase of 4.56 visits/day, and combined visits (HAE and CAE) had an increase of 4.95 visits/day. Conclusions: The FDA OTC hearing aid ruling did not have a meaningful impact on the volume of HAEs and CAEs at an academic audiology practice. We found a small trend toward increased volume. Future studies should investigate visit patterns in other practice models to understand the full impact of the ruling on clinical audiology practice volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Audiology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 190286342
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weinstein%2C+Hannah+N%2E+W%2E%22">Weinstein, Hannah N. W.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tucker%2C+Lauren+H%2E%22">Tucker, Lauren H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fernandez%2C+Karla+Y%2E%22">Fernandez, Karla Y.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Galatioto%2C+Jessica+A%2E%22">Galatioto, Jessica A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Golub%2C+Justin+S%2E%22">Golub, Justin S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> justin.golub@columbia.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Audiology%22">American Journal of Audiology</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1013-1018. 6p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Auditory+perception+testing%22">Auditory perception testing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+medical+centers%22">Academic medical centers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retrospective+studies%22">Retrospective studies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+disorders%22">Hearing disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+practice%22">Professional practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+aids%22">Hearing aids</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+appointments%22">Medical appointments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+records%22">Medical records</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acquisition+of+data%22">Acquisition of data</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Audiologists%22">Audiologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensitivity+%26+specificity+%28Statistics%29%22">Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectCompany
  Label: Company/Entity
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+Food+%26+Drug+Administration%22">United States. Food & Drug Administration</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids nationwide. The impact on audiology practice has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study is to determine if there was a change in the volume of hearing aid evaluations (HAEs) and comprehensive audiologic exams (CAEs) at an academic tertiary care audiology practice following the ruling. Method: Data were collected from the billing records of patients ≥ 18 years old. HAE and CAE visits, defined by Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, were included. The number of visits was totaled for equal time periods (534 days) before and after October 17, 2022, when OTC hearing aid sales began. Sensitivity analysis (365 days before and after the ruling) accounted for seasonality. Change in visits per day over the entire period was calculated from the slope of the line of best fit. Results: The mean (SD) age was 60.5 (18.3) years. There were 20,300 combined HAE and CAE visits. Compared to before the ruling, over the entire study period (534 days), HAE visits increased by 12.0% (n = 57), CAE visits increased by 7.3% (n = 685), and combined visits (HAE and CAE) increased by 7.6% (n = 744) after the ruling. Over the entire study period (534 days), HAE had an increase of 0.084 visits/day, CAE had an increase of 4.56 visits/day, and combined visits (HAE and CAE) had an increase of 4.95 visits/day. Conclusions: The FDA OTC hearing aid ruling did not have a meaningful impact on the volume of HAEs and CAEs at an academic audiology practice. We found a small trend toward increased volume. Future studies should investigate visit patterns in other practice models to understand the full impact of the ruling on clinical audiology practice volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Audiology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=190286342
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00069
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 6
        StartPage: 1013
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Auditory perception testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic medical centers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hearing disorders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hearing aids
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical appointments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical records
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Audiologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States. Food & Drug Administration
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Weinstein, Hannah N. W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tucker, Lauren H.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fernandez, Karla Y.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Galatioto, Jessica A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Golub, Justin S.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10590889
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Audiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1