View in EDS PDF Full Text

Validation of Novel Clinical Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Breathiness and Roughness.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Validation of Novel Clinical Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Breathiness and Roughness.
Authors: Anand, Supraja1 suprajaanand@usf.edu, Park, Yeonggwang2,3, Awan, Shaheen N.2,3, Shaw Bonilha, Heather4, Shrivastav, Rahul5, Eddins, David A.2,3
Source: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Feb2026, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p526-540. 15p.
Subject Terms: *Data analysis, *Voice disorders, *Research methodology evaluation, *Research methodology, *Speech perception, Pearson correlation (Statistics), T-test (Statistics), Pilot projects, Psychometrics, Intraclass correlation, Statistics, Human voice, Regression analysis
Abstract: Objective: Perceived voice quality (VQ) ratings provide data with ordinal characteristics on arbitrary scales regarding the relative order of VQ disruptions ranging from mild to severe quality. The overarching goal of this research is to develop a new and rigorous method for perceptual evaluation of VQ using quantitative comparisons and facilitating standardized comparisons across time points, clinicians, and clinical sites. Our prior research developed standard ratio-level scales of breathy and rough VQ analogous to the sone scale that (a) have physical units, (b) are strongly related to psychophysical measures, and (c) can quantify not just the direction but also the magnitude of change. The current study reestablishes the standard reference points, validates the newly developed VQ scales with natural dysphonic stimuli, and evaluates the psychometric measurement properties of the novel scales for breathiness and roughness in a small clinical pilot experiment. Method: In the first experiment, a set of magnitude estimation (ME) tasks were first used to determine the perceived magnitudes of breathiness and roughness of 10 natural voice stimuli in each VQ continuum. The resulting data were compared with previously acquired magnitude estimates of the synthetic comparison stimuli to adjust the reference points. In the second experiment, a set of inexperienced listeners evaluated the same set of natural dysphonic stimuli using the new clinical scales with perceived magnitude expressed in standard VQ units. In the third experiment, two expert clinicians evaluated 12 breathy and 10 rough dysphonic voices (pre- and posttreatment) using the new VQ scales. Results: The standard reference units were identified as 15 dB SNR for breathiness and -26 dB modulation depth for roughness. The strength of the relationship between the ME data and the predicted values from the clinical scales was high for both breathiness and roughness (r > .9). Treatment outcomes measured using the newly developed scales demonstrated high intra- (r > .8) and interrater reliability (r > .8) when compared to Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice providing evidence for concurrent validity of the clinical scales. Conclusion: Such formal VQ scales support valid quantitative comparisons of perceptual judgments and represent a critical step in clinical translation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 191547600
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Validation of Novel Clinical Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Breathiness and Roughness.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anand%2C+Supraja%22">Anand, Supraja</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> suprajaanand@usf.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Park%2C+Yeonggwang%22">Park, Yeonggwang</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Awan%2C+Shaheen+N%2E%22">Awan, Shaheen N.</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shaw+Bonilha%2C+Heather%22">Shaw Bonilha, Heather</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shrivastav%2C+Rahul%22">Shrivastav, Rahul</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eddins%2C+David+A%2E%22">Eddins, David A.</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Speech%2C+Language+%26+Hearing+Research%22">Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research</searchLink>. Feb2026, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p526-540. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Voice+disorders%22">Voice disorders</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology+evaluation%22">Research methodology evaluation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech+perception%22">Speech perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pearson+correlation+%28Statistics%29%22">Pearson correlation (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pilot+projects%22">Pilot projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychometrics%22">Psychometrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intraclass+correlation%22">Intraclass correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+voice%22">Human voice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective: Perceived voice quality (VQ) ratings provide data with ordinal characteristics on arbitrary scales regarding the relative order of VQ disruptions ranging from mild to severe quality. The overarching goal of this research is to develop a new and rigorous method for perceptual evaluation of VQ using quantitative comparisons and facilitating standardized comparisons across time points, clinicians, and clinical sites. Our prior research developed standard ratio-level scales of breathy and rough VQ analogous to the sone scale that (a) have physical units, (b) are strongly related to psychophysical measures, and (c) can quantify not just the direction but also the magnitude of change. The current study reestablishes the standard reference points, validates the newly developed VQ scales with natural dysphonic stimuli, and evaluates the psychometric measurement properties of the novel scales for breathiness and roughness in a small clinical pilot experiment. Method: In the first experiment, a set of magnitude estimation (ME) tasks were first used to determine the perceived magnitudes of breathiness and roughness of 10 natural voice stimuli in each VQ continuum. The resulting data were compared with previously acquired magnitude estimates of the synthetic comparison stimuli to adjust the reference points. In the second experiment, a set of inexperienced listeners evaluated the same set of natural dysphonic stimuli using the new clinical scales with perceived magnitude expressed in standard VQ units. In the third experiment, two expert clinicians evaluated 12 breathy and 10 rough dysphonic voices (pre- and posttreatment) using the new VQ scales. Results: The standard reference units were identified as 15 dB SNR for breathiness and -26 dB modulation depth for roughness. The strength of the relationship between the ME data and the predicted values from the clinical scales was high for both breathiness and roughness (r > .9). Treatment outcomes measured using the newly developed scales demonstrated high intra- (r > .8) and interrater reliability (r > .8) when compared to Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice providing evidence for concurrent validity of the clinical scales. Conclusion: Such formal VQ scales support valid quantitative comparisons of perceptual judgments and represent a critical step in clinical translation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=191547600
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00321
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 526
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Voice disorders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Speech perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pearson correlation (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pilot projects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intraclass correlation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Human voice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Regression analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Validation of Novel Clinical Scales for Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Breathiness and Roughness.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anand, Supraja
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Park, Yeonggwang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Awan, Shaheen N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shaw Bonilha, Heather
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shrivastav, Rahul
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Eddins, David A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10924388
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 69
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1