Peer review in Chinese national journals: historical development and challenges.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Peer review in Chinese national journals: historical development and challenges.
Authors: Wang, Pengjuan1,2 (AUTHOR), Horta, Hugo1 (AUTHOR) horta@hku.hk
Source: Higher Education (00181560). Mar2026, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p969-991. 23p.
Subject Terms: *Scholarly periodicals, *Scientific communication, *Scholarly publishing, *Professional peer review, Historical institutionalism (Sociology), Guanxi
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: This study analyzes the history of journal peer review in China through the theoretical lens of historical institutionalism. By analyzing historical records and policies published by the Chinese government and other sources on national journal peer review, this study shows that the history of journal peer review systems in China can be divided into four periods. The first period emerged in the eighteenth century, when the academic beliefs and habits of traditional Chinese intellectuals pushed for peer review alongside the creation of academic/scientific journals (these did not last). The second period occurred in the early twentieth century, when the paradigm of Western science gradually influenced and replaced traditional Chinese science. The procedures and form of peer review in Chinese journals started to become similar to those in Europe and North America. During the third period, after the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and until the end of the 1990s, peer review in Chinese journals was more political than scientific. The fourth and current period started in the 2000s, when peer review in China increasingly adopted global science review procedures, but the current peer review system combines global peer review principles with the opposite logic of favor (renqing). The analysis shows that historically peer-review in national journals in China has both converged and differed with peer-review practices internationally, influenced by global and national values, events and pressures, and even today there is but a partial alignment in terms of peer review practices and processes between Chinese national journals and international journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 192687512
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Peer review in Chinese national journals: historical development and challenges.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Pengjuan%22">Wang, Pengjuan</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Horta%2C+Hugo%22">Horta, Hugo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> horta@hku.hk</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Higher+Education+%2800181560%29%22">Higher Education (00181560)</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 91 Issue 3, p969-991. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+periodicals%22">Scholarly periodicals</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+communication%22">Scientific communication</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+publishing%22">Scholarly publishing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+peer+review%22">Professional peer review</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Historical+institutionalism+%28Sociology%29%22">Historical institutionalism (Sociology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Guanxi%22">Guanxi</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study analyzes the history of journal peer review in China through the theoretical lens of historical institutionalism. By analyzing historical records and policies published by the Chinese government and other sources on national journal peer review, this study shows that the history of journal peer review systems in China can be divided into four periods. The first period emerged in the eighteenth century, when the academic beliefs and habits of traditional Chinese intellectuals pushed for peer review alongside the creation of academic/scientific journals (these did not last). The second period occurred in the early twentieth century, when the paradigm of Western science gradually influenced and replaced traditional Chinese science. The procedures and form of peer review in Chinese journals started to become similar to those in Europe and North America. During the third period, after the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949 and until the end of the 1990s, peer review in Chinese journals was more political than scientific. The fourth and current period started in the 2000s, when peer review in China increasingly adopted global science review procedures, but the current peer review system combines global peer review principles with the opposite logic of favor (renqing). The analysis shows that historically peer-review in national journals in China has both converged and differed with peer-review practices internationally, influenced by global and national values, events and pressures, and even today there is but a partial alignment in terms of peer review practices and processes between Chinese national journals and international journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=192687512
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10734-025-01452-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 969
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Scholarly periodicals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scholarly publishing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional peer review
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Historical institutionalism (Sociology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Guanxi
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Peer review in Chinese national journals: historical development and challenges.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Pengjuan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Horta, Hugo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00181560
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 91
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Higher Education (00181560)
              Type: main
ResultId 1