Improving Evidence-Based Practice Through the Development and Validation of Key Words to Identify Intervention Articles in Communication Disorders.
Saved in:
| Title: | Improving Evidence-Based Practice Through the Development and Validation of Key Words to Identify Intervention Articles in Communication Disorders. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Nisha, Sonia Islam1, Wang, Qingyun2, Yu, Charles2, Ji, Heng2, Hendricks, Alison Eisel1 ahendric@buffalo.edu |
| Source: | Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools. Apr2026, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p525-540. 16p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Database searching, *Data analysis, *Artificial intelligence, *Speech-language pathology, *Experimental design, *Inter-observer reliability, Treatment of communicative disorders, Subject headings, Research funding, Research evaluation, Statistical sampling, Data curation, Natural language processing, Statistics, Acquisition of data, Medical research, Evidence-based medicine, Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics), Abstracting & indexing services |
| Company/Entity: | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Although evidence-based practice (EBP) promotes better clinical practice, implementing it in speech-language pathology is challenging. A limited number of intervention studies and inconsistent use of key words in abstracts complicates the implementation of EBP. Given time constraints in clinical practice, identifying relevant research from study abstracts would provide an efficient method for identifying intervention studies. In this project, we compare the classification accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-created set of key words and a set of evidencebased key words that were developed through an analysis of commonly used words in intervention abstracts from American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) journals. Method: Abstracts from three major ASHA journals were crawled using Selenium and WebDriver Manager, creating a large database of abstracts for analysis. In Study 1, a random sample of 180 abstracts was annotated as reporting on intervention or nonintervention studies to develop a set of evidence-based key words. In Study 2, classification accuracy was calculated to validate these key words by comparing them with a set of AI-generated (ChatGPT-4.0) key words. Results: The results suggested that 12%-15% of studies report on an intervention study. Evidence-based key words had higher sensitivity (85%) and a higher positive predictive value (27%) but a lower specificity rate (67%). Also, the likelihood ratio suggested that evidence-based key words had a moderate capacity to identify nonintervention studies (true negatives) accurately. Conclusions: Evidence-based key words have the potential to accurately classify intervention studies, addressing a key barrier to EBP implementation in clinical practice. Future research should focus on refining key words by integrating AI and promoting standardized journal reporting by incorporating uniform key words in abstracts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 192859142 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Improving Evidence-Based Practice Through the Development and Validation of Key Words to Identify Intervention Articles in Communication Disorders. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nisha%2C+Sonia+Islam%22">Nisha, Sonia Islam</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Qingyun%22">Wang, Qingyun</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yu%2C+Charles%22">Yu, Charles</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ji%2C+Heng%22">Ji, Heng</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hendricks%2C+Alison+Eisel%22">Hendricks, Alison Eisel</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> ahendric@buffalo.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Language%2C+Speech+%26+Hearing+Services+in+Schools%22">Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools</searchLink>. Apr2026, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p525-540. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Database+searching%22">Database searching</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+intelligence%22">Artificial intelligence</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech-language+pathology%22">Speech-language pathology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inter-observer+reliability%22">Inter-observer reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+of+communicative+disorders%22">Treatment of communicative disorders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Subject+headings%22">Subject headings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+sampling%22">Statistical sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+curation%22">Data curation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+language+processing%22">Natural language processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acquisition+of+data%22">Acquisition of data</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+research%22">Medical research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence-based+medicine%22">Evidence-based medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensitivity+%26+specificity+%28Statistics%29%22">Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Abstracting+%26+indexing+services%22">Abstracting & indexing services</searchLink> – Name: SubjectCompany Label: Company/Entity Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22American+Speech-Language-Hearing+Association%22">American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: Although evidence-based practice (EBP) promotes better clinical practice, implementing it in speech-language pathology is challenging. A limited number of intervention studies and inconsistent use of key words in abstracts complicates the implementation of EBP. Given time constraints in clinical practice, identifying relevant research from study abstracts would provide an efficient method for identifying intervention studies. In this project, we compare the classification accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-created set of key words and a set of evidencebased key words that were developed through an analysis of commonly used words in intervention abstracts from American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) journals. Method: Abstracts from three major ASHA journals were crawled using Selenium and WebDriver Manager, creating a large database of abstracts for analysis. In Study 1, a random sample of 180 abstracts was annotated as reporting on intervention or nonintervention studies to develop a set of evidence-based key words. In Study 2, classification accuracy was calculated to validate these key words by comparing them with a set of AI-generated (ChatGPT-4.0) key words. Results: The results suggested that 12%-15% of studies report on an intervention study. Evidence-based key words had higher sensitivity (85%) and a higher positive predictive value (27%) but a lower specificity rate (67%). Also, the likelihood ratio suggested that evidence-based key words had a moderate capacity to identify nonintervention studies (true negatives) accurately. Conclusions: Evidence-based key words have the potential to accurately classify intervention studies, addressing a key barrier to EBP implementation in clinical practice. Future research should focus on refining key words by integrating AI and promoting standardized journal reporting by incorporating uniform key words in abstracts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=192859142 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1044/2025_LSHSS-25-00144 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 525 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Database searching Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Speech-language pathology Type: general – SubjectFull: Experimental design Type: general – SubjectFull: Inter-observer reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment of communicative disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Subject headings Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Data curation Type: general – SubjectFull: Natural language processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical research Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence-based medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Abstracting & indexing services Type: general – SubjectFull: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Improving Evidence-Based Practice Through the Development and Validation of Key Words to Identify Intervention Articles in Communication Disorders. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nisha, Sonia Islam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Qingyun – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yu, Charles – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ji, Heng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hendricks, Alison Eisel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01611461 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 57 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |