Evaluating Training for Occupational Therapists and Clinical Psychologists to Deliver Vocational Rehabilitation Within a Clinical Trial: Mixed-Methods Study.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating Training for Occupational Therapists and Clinical Psychologists to Deliver Vocational Rehabilitation Within a Clinical Trial: Mixed-Methods Study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kellezi, Blerina1,2 (AUTHOR) Blerina.kellezi@ntu.ac.uk, Holmes, Jain3,4 (AUTHOR), Radford, Kate3,4 (AUTHOR), Nair, Roshan das5 (AUTHOR), Lindley, Rebecca1,4 (AUTHOR), Mann, Claire1 (AUTHOR), Andrews, Isabel1 (AUTHOR), Fallon, Stephen1 (AUTHOR), Kendrick, Denise1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. May2026, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p261-274. 14p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Data analysis, *Occupational therapists, *Course evaluation (Education), *Pre-tests & post-tests, *Vocational rehabilitation, *Clinical competence, *Research methodology, *Learning strategies, *Inter-observer reliability, *Employment reentry, Psychologists, Research funding, Interviewing, Thematic analysis, Intraclass correlation, Statistics, Confidence intervals, Psychosocial factors |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| Abstract: | Background: Delayed return-to-work is common after serious injury. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) supports people to return to/remain in work. We developed training for occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs) to deliver a VR intervention (Return to Work After Trauma-ROWTATE) to UK trauma patients within a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Objectives: Evaluate the training, OT/CP competence and confidence to deliver ROWTATE, attitudes/confidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Methods: Competency was assessed through Team Objective Structured Clinical Examination and two tasks (management plan, employer letter). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) estimated inter-rater reliability. Questionnaires measured EBP attitudes (EBPAS-36) and confidence (EPIC) pre and post-training and confidence in ROWTATE delivery post-training. Semi-structured interviews captured training experiences and confidence. Results: 47 OTs and 16 CPs completed training. Competency scores were high (OT range=27.5–37.5; CP range=28.5–37; maximum=38). Inter-rater reliability was moderate (OT ICC=0.56, 95%CI 0.18,0.77; CP ICC=0.73, 95%CI −0.22,0.93). EBPAS-36 scores were high pre and post-training with no significant increase post-training. OT confidence in applying evidence (P = 0.01) and evaluating effect of their actions (P = 0.04) increased significantly post-training. OTs and CPs had high confidence (80–100% across questions) in delivering ROWTATE. Conclusions: VR training resulted in high competency scores, improvements in EBP confidence and high confidence in delivering ROWTATE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 192937014 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating Training for Occupational Therapists and Clinical Psychologists to Deliver Vocational Rehabilitation Within a Clinical Trial: Mixed-Methods Study. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kellezi%2C+Blerina%22">Kellezi, Blerina</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Blerina.kellezi@ntu.ac.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holmes%2C+Jain%22">Holmes, Jain</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Radford%2C+Kate%22">Radford, Kate</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nair%2C+Roshan+das%22">Nair, Roshan das</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lindley%2C+Rebecca%22">Lindley, Rebecca</searchLink><relatesTo>1,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mann%2C+Claire%22">Mann, Claire</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrews%2C+Isabel%22">Andrews, Isabel</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fallon%2C+Stephen%22">Fallon, Stephen</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kendrick%2C+Denise%22">Kendrick, Denise</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Vocational+Rehabilitation%22">Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p261-274. 14p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Occupational+therapists%22">Occupational therapists</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+evaluation+%28Education%29%22">Course evaluation (Education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pre-tests+%26+post-tests%22">Pre-tests & post-tests</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+rehabilitation%22">Vocational rehabilitation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+competence%22">Clinical competence</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+strategies%22">Learning strategies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inter-observer+reliability%22">Inter-observer reliability</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+reentry%22">Employment reentry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychologists%22">Psychologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intraclass+correlation%22">Intraclass correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Delayed return-to-work is common after serious injury. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) supports people to return to/remain in work. We developed training for occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs) to deliver a VR intervention (Return to Work After Trauma-ROWTATE) to UK trauma patients within a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Objectives: Evaluate the training, OT/CP competence and confidence to deliver ROWTATE, attitudes/confidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Methods: Competency was assessed through Team Objective Structured Clinical Examination and two tasks (management plan, employer letter). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) estimated inter-rater reliability. Questionnaires measured EBP attitudes (EBPAS-36) and confidence (EPIC) pre and post-training and confidence in ROWTATE delivery post-training. Semi-structured interviews captured training experiences and confidence. Results: 47 OTs and 16 CPs completed training. Competency scores were high (OT range=27.5–37.5; CP range=28.5–37; maximum=38). Inter-rater reliability was moderate (OT ICC=0.56, 95%CI 0.18,0.77; CP ICC=0.73, 95%CI −0.22,0.93). EBPAS-36 scores were high pre and post-training with no significant increase post-training. OT confidence in applying evidence (P = 0.01) and evaluating effect of their actions (P = 0.04) increased significantly post-training. OTs and CPs had high confidence (80–100% across questions) in delivering ROWTATE. Conclusions: VR training resulted in high competency scores, improvements in EBP confidence and high confidence in delivering ROWTATE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=192937014 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/10522263261430878 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 261 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Occupational therapists Type: general – SubjectFull: Course evaluation (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Pre-tests & post-tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocational rehabilitation Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Inter-observer reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment reentry Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychologists Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Intraclass correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating Training for Occupational Therapists and Clinical Psychologists to Deliver Vocational Rehabilitation Within a Clinical Trial: Mixed-Methods Study. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kellezi, Blerina – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Holmes, Jain – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Radford, Kate – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nair, Roshan das – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lindley, Rebecca – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mann, Claire – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andrews, Isabel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fallon, Stephen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kendrick, Denise IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10522263 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 64 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |