Maximal Transparency for Online Recommender Systems.
Saved in:
| Title: | Maximal Transparency for Online Recommender Systems. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dormandy, Katherine1 (AUTHOR) katherine.dormandy@uibk.ac.at, Rodriguez-R, Luis M.2 (AUTHOR) lmr@bio.aau.dk, Court, Sébastien3 (AUTHOR) Sebastien.Court@uibk.ac.at, Jatowt, Adam4 (AUTHOR) Adam.Jatowt@uibk.ac.at, König-Kersting, Carina5 (AUTHOR) Carina.Koenig@uibk.ac.at, Kupfer, Alexander6 (AUTHOR) Alexander.Kupfer@uibk.ac.at, Piater, Justus4 (AUTHOR) Justus.Piater@uibk.ac.at, Rauchegger, Clara7 (AUTHOR) Clara.Rauchegger@uibk.ac.at |
| Source: | Philosophy & Technology. Jun2026, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p1-30. 30p. |
| Abstract: | Online recommender systems, such as those found on newsfeeds or e-commerce websites, give users options specifically tailored for them, and nudge users toward certain options and away from others. Transparency in such systems matters. One reason is that platforms may deploy user data for certain ends, beyond making recommendations, that users arguably have a right to know about. Another is that such systems can encode biases favoring or disadvantaging certain stakeholders. Transparency exposes these biases and other forms of potential unfairness. But what is transparency in the context of recommender systems? This question is harder than meets the eye, given the complexity of online platforms, of the variables that determine the workings of recommender-system algorithms, and of the world itself that these systems distill into data and inferences. We give an account of maximal transparency – what transparency looks like supposing that technical implementation is no obstacle. Maximal transparency itself has many dimensions that admit of degree. This paper makes an indirect contribution to the ethics of transparency for online recommender systems – not because we argue that maximal transparency is ethically desirable (it almost certainly isn’t), but because we perform the logically prior task of clarifying what it is to begin with. This gives us a limiting case of transparency along multiple dimensions, providing multiple choice points from which an ethics of transparency can be built. We also identify stakeholders whose needs would play a role in determining which dimensions and degrees of transparency would be ethically optimal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Philosophy & Technology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 192945353 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Maximal Transparency for Online Recommender Systems. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dormandy%2C+Katherine%22">Dormandy, Katherine</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> katherine.dormandy@uibk.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodriguez-R%2C+Luis+M%2E%22">Rodriguez-R, Luis M.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> lmr@bio.aau.dk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Court%2C+Sébastien%22">Court, Sébastien</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Sebastien.Court@uibk.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jatowt%2C+Adam%22">Jatowt, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Adam.Jatowt@uibk.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22König-Kersting%2C+Carina%22">König-Kersting, Carina</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Carina.Koenig@uibk.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kupfer%2C+Alexander%22">Kupfer, Alexander</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Alexander.Kupfer@uibk.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Piater%2C+Justus%22">Piater, Justus</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Justus.Piater@uibk.ac.at</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rauchegger%2C+Clara%22">Rauchegger, Clara</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Clara.Rauchegger@uibk.ac.at</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Philosophy+%26+Technology%22">Philosophy & Technology</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p1-30. 30p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Online recommender systems, such as those found on newsfeeds or e-commerce websites, give users options specifically tailored for them, and nudge users toward certain options and away from others. Transparency in such systems matters. One reason is that platforms may deploy user data for certain ends, beyond making recommendations, that users arguably have a right to know about. Another is that such systems can encode biases favoring or disadvantaging certain stakeholders. Transparency exposes these biases and other forms of potential unfairness. But what is transparency in the context of recommender systems? This question is harder than meets the eye, given the complexity of online platforms, of the variables that determine the workings of recommender-system algorithms, and of the world itself that these systems distill into data and inferences. We give an account of maximal transparency – what transparency looks like supposing that technical implementation is no obstacle. Maximal transparency itself has many dimensions that admit of degree. This paper makes an indirect contribution to the ethics of transparency for online recommender systems – not because we argue that maximal transparency is ethically desirable (it almost certainly isn’t), but because we perform the logically prior task of clarifying what it is to begin with. This gives us a limiting case of transparency along multiple dimensions, providing multiple choice points from which an ethics of transparency can be built. We also identify stakeholders whose needs would play a role in determining which dimensions and degrees of transparency would be ethically optimal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Philosophy & Technology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=192945353 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s13347-026-01084-7 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 30 StartPage: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Maximal Transparency for Online Recommender Systems. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dormandy, Katherine – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rodriguez-R, Luis M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Court, Sébastien – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jatowt, Adam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: König-Kersting, Carina – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kupfer, Alexander – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Piater, Justus – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rauchegger, Clara IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 22105433 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 39 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Philosophy & Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
