Altered Selective Attention or Increased Imagination: Effects of Eye Closure on Vocal Expression Perception.
Saved in:
| Title: | Altered Selective Attention or Increased Imagination: Effects of Eye Closure on Vocal Expression Perception. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Jiang, Xiaoming1,2 xiaoming.jiang@shisu.edu.cn, Luo, Renneng1,2, Yang, Qi3 |
| Source: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Apr2026, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1395-1418. 24p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Computer software, *Data analysis, *Fatigue (Physiology), *Confidence, *Anxiety, *Communication, *Speech perception, *Imagination, *College students, Statistical models, Prompts (Psychology), Task performance, Sound, Research funding, Selectivity (Psychology), Factorial experiment designs, Questionnaires, Chi-squared test, Multivariate analysis, Physiological aspects of speech, Sound recordings, Odds ratio, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Statistics, Intraclass correlation, Confidence intervals, Blinking (Physiology), Eye movements |
| Abstract: | Purpose: This study investigated how eye closure (EC) affects vocal expression perception, testing two hypotheses: Hypothesis 1 proposes that EC enhances selective attention to task-related cues while suppressing prosodic processing, predicting higher expressiveness ratings for full (unmodified) versus filtered (acoustically degraded stimuli under eye-closed conditions) stimuli. Hypothesis 2 posits that EC activates compensatory imagination, expecting filtered (semantically neutral) stimuli to elicit higher ratings than full stimuli. Method: Forty listeners completed three tasks: sound verification task (detecting probe sounds), confidence rating task (evaluating listener-perceived confidence levels), and expressiveness rating (assessing emotional expressiveness) under EC and eyes-open (EO) conditions across full and filtered auditory modes. Results: The findings supported Hypothesis 1: EC led to significantly higher confidence and expressiveness ratings than the EO condition. Filtered stimuli received lower ratings than full stimuli across tasks, suggesting that EC enhanced selective attention to vocal prosody without engaging imaginative compensation (Hypothesis 2). Notably, EC did not affect sound verification hit rates, implying that its facilitative effects are more salient in cognitively demanding tasks (e.g., subjective ratings) than basic sound detection. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that EC enhances vocal perception primarily through selective attention mechanisms, not imagination. The study advances theoretical understanding of EC's role in modulating attentional allocation during vocal processing, while highlighting (a) cognitive effects of shortterm visual deprivation on auditory perception and (b) dynamic cross-modal interactions between visual withdrawal and acoustic cue integration during speech comprehension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 192982168 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Altered Selective Attention or Increased Imagination: Effects of Eye Closure on Vocal Expression Perception. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiang%2C+Xiaoming%22">Jiang, Xiaoming</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> xiaoming.jiang@shisu.edu.cn</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luo%2C+Renneng%22">Luo, Renneng</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Qi%22">Yang, Qi</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Speech%2C+Language+%26+Hearing+Research%22">Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research</searchLink>. Apr2026, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1395-1418. 24p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+software%22">Computer software</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Fatigue+%28Physiology%29%22">Fatigue (Physiology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence%22">Confidence</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anxiety%22">Anxiety</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication%22">Communication</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech+perception%22">Speech perception</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Imagination%22">Imagination</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+models%22">Statistical models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompts+%28Psychology%29%22">Prompts (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+performance%22">Task performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sound%22">Sound</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Selectivity+%28Psychology%29%22">Selectivity (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factorial+experiment+designs%22">Factorial experiment designs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chi-squared+test%22">Chi-squared test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multivariate+analysis%22">Multivariate analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physiological+aspects+of+speech%22">Physiological aspects of speech</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sound+recordings%22">Sound recordings</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Odds+ratio%22">Odds ratio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State-Trait+Anxiety+Inventory%22">State-Trait Anxiety Inventory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intraclass+correlation%22">Intraclass correlation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blinking+%28Physiology%29%22">Blinking (Physiology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eye+movements%22">Eye movements</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: This study investigated how eye closure (EC) affects vocal expression perception, testing two hypotheses: Hypothesis 1 proposes that EC enhances selective attention to task-related cues while suppressing prosodic processing, predicting higher expressiveness ratings for full (unmodified) versus filtered (acoustically degraded stimuli under eye-closed conditions) stimuli. Hypothesis 2 posits that EC activates compensatory imagination, expecting filtered (semantically neutral) stimuli to elicit higher ratings than full stimuli. Method: Forty listeners completed three tasks: sound verification task (detecting probe sounds), confidence rating task (evaluating listener-perceived confidence levels), and expressiveness rating (assessing emotional expressiveness) under EC and eyes-open (EO) conditions across full and filtered auditory modes. Results: The findings supported Hypothesis 1: EC led to significantly higher confidence and expressiveness ratings than the EO condition. Filtered stimuli received lower ratings than full stimuli across tasks, suggesting that EC enhanced selective attention to vocal prosody without engaging imaginative compensation (Hypothesis 2). Notably, EC did not affect sound verification hit rates, implying that its facilitative effects are more salient in cognitively demanding tasks (e.g., subjective ratings) than basic sound detection. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that EC enhances vocal perception primarily through selective attention mechanisms, not imagination. The study advances theoretical understanding of EC's role in modulating attentional allocation during vocal processing, while highlighting (a) cognitive effects of shortterm visual deprivation on auditory perception and (b) dynamic cross-modal interactions between visual withdrawal and acoustic cue integration during speech comprehension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=192982168 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00294 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 24 StartPage: 1395 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Computer software Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Fatigue (Physiology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Anxiety Type: general – SubjectFull: Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Speech perception Type: general – SubjectFull: Imagination Type: general – SubjectFull: College students Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical models Type: general – SubjectFull: Prompts (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Task performance Type: general – SubjectFull: Sound Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Selectivity (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Factorial experiment designs Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test Type: general – SubjectFull: Multivariate analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Physiological aspects of speech Type: general – SubjectFull: Sound recordings Type: general – SubjectFull: Odds ratio Type: general – SubjectFull: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Intraclass correlation Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Blinking (Physiology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Eye movements Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Altered Selective Attention or Increased Imagination: Effects of Eye Closure on Vocal Expression Perception. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jiang, Xiaoming – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Luo, Renneng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yang, Qi IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10924388 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 69 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |