View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Exploring 'failure to fail' behaviour among examiners of undergraduate medical programs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring 'failure to fail' behaviour among examiners of undergraduate medical programs.
Authors: Sethi, Ahsan1 (AUTHOR) asethi@qu.edu.qa, Khan, Naveed Afzal2 (AUTHOR), Zaib, Alia Jehan3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Medical Teacher. May2026, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p812-824. 13p.
Subject Terms: *Medical education, *Qualitative research, *Occupational roles, *Undergraduates, *Educational tests & measurements, *Decision making, *School failure, *Motivation (Psychology), *College teacher attitudes, *Medical schools, *Research, *Research methodology, Self-efficacy, Professional ethics, Patient safety, Interviewing, Judgment sampling, Social perception, Work experience (Employment), Descriptive statistics, Professions, Case-control method, Quality assurance, Professional competence
Geographic Terms: Pakistan
Abstract: Background: Even though a lot has been written on 'failure to fail' behaviors of educators in developed and resource-rich countries, there have been no studies from developing and resource-constrained countries, which are among the major contributors of international medical graduates to the healthcare systems worldwide. Understanding such behaviors of examiners has significant implications for professionalism, patient safety, and healthcare worldwide. Using game theory, the current study explores the determinants of 'failure to fail' underperforming medical students from examiners of six medical schools in Pakistan. Methods: A qualitative multi-institutional case study was carried out in Pakistan. Using a purposive maximum variation sampling technique, 15 examiners of basic and clinical sciences from six medical schools providing undergraduate medical education were selected and interviewed. The data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a Framework analysis approach. Results: The examiners were against passing any student who did not deserve to pass, but they reported failure to do so. Using Game Theory, we identified four key elements that may influence examiners' decision-making in assessment: players and their strategies, perceived personal payoffs, perceived social payoffs, and game rules (policies, norms, and practices). The examiners comply under pressure from various players, including the students, friends, family, higher administration, and political figures. Their behaviors were also influenced by rules set by examiners, the assessment system, the competitive market, and socio-culture environment. Conclusions: The personal, social, and systemic constraints and consequences lead to poor assessment of medical students' knowledge and competence, which has significant implications for patient safety and healthcare worldwide. Some of these constraints may be unique to the developing countries' context; however, many others are prevalent even in the developed countries. Whether through examiner peer mentorship, restructured institutional incentives, or clear assessment policies, breaking the equilibrium of 'failure to fail' lies in a society of integrity and accountability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 193123977
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Exploring 'failure to fail' behaviour among examiners of undergraduate medical programs.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sethi%2C+Ahsan%22">Sethi, Ahsan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> asethi@qu.edu.qa</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Khan%2C+Naveed+Afzal%22">Khan, Naveed Afzal</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zaib%2C+Alia+Jehan%22">Zaib, Alia Jehan</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 48 Issue 5, p812-824. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Occupational+roles%22">Occupational roles</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduates%22">Undergraduates</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+failure%22">School failure</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teacher+attitudes%22">College teacher attitudes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+schools%22">Medical schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+ethics%22">Professional ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+safety%22">Patient safety</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+sampling%22">Judgment sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+perception%22">Social perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+experience+%28Employment%29%22">Work experience (Employment)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professions%22">Professions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case-control+method%22">Case-control method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+competence%22">Professional competence</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pakistan%22">Pakistan</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Even though a lot has been written on 'failure to fail' behaviors of educators in developed and resource-rich countries, there have been no studies from developing and resource-constrained countries, which are among the major contributors of international medical graduates to the healthcare systems worldwide. Understanding such behaviors of examiners has significant implications for professionalism, patient safety, and healthcare worldwide. Using game theory, the current study explores the determinants of 'failure to fail' underperforming medical students from examiners of six medical schools in Pakistan. Methods: A qualitative multi-institutional case study was carried out in Pakistan. Using a purposive maximum variation sampling technique, 15 examiners of basic and clinical sciences from six medical schools providing undergraduate medical education were selected and interviewed. The data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a Framework analysis approach. Results: The examiners were against passing any student who did not deserve to pass, but they reported failure to do so. Using Game Theory, we identified four key elements that may influence examiners' decision-making in assessment: players and their strategies, perceived personal payoffs, perceived social payoffs, and game rules (policies, norms, and practices). The examiners comply under pressure from various players, including the students, friends, family, higher administration, and political figures. Their behaviors were also influenced by rules set by examiners, the assessment system, the competitive market, and socio-culture environment. Conclusions: The personal, social, and systemic constraints and consequences lead to poor assessment of medical students' knowledge and competence, which has significant implications for patient safety and healthcare worldwide. Some of these constraints may be unique to the developing countries' context; however, many others are prevalent even in the developed countries. Whether through examiner peer mentorship, restructured institutional incentives, or clear assessment policies, breaking the equilibrium of 'failure to fail' lies in a society of integrity and accountability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=193123977
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2025.2593493
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 812
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Medical education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Occupational roles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduates
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School failure
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College teacher attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patient safety
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Judgment sampling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Work experience (Employment)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Case-control method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality assurance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pakistan
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Exploring 'failure to fail' behaviour among examiners of undergraduate medical programs.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sethi, Ahsan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Khan, Naveed Afzal
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zaib, Alia Jehan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0142159X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 48
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Teacher
              Type: main
ResultId 1