THANK YOU, TEACHER. IN ‘OTHER PEOPLES’ WORDS! A STUDY OF THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SECTIONS.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: THANK YOU, TEACHER. IN ‘OTHER PEOPLES’ WORDS! A STUDY OF THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SECTIONS.
Source: Nonpartisan Education Review. 2025, Vol. 21, p2-10. 9p.
Subject Terms: *Plagiarism, *Academic discourse, *Graduate students, *Graduate medical education, Paraphrase
Geographic Terms: India
Abstract: Background Thesis work is an integral part of medical postgraduate education in India. However, despite producing a large number of theses every year, only a tiny percentage of this research makes its way to standard medical journals around the world. One reason for this is the relative lack of novelty, innovation, and imagination in this research. Methods We looked at the acknowledgement sections of 63 medical thesis manuscripts from 4 different colleges. By comparing the acknowledgement passages penned by the researchers, we assessed the extent of plagiarism/ paraphrasing in the sentences and phrases used. Results The extent of plagiarism and paraphrasing was surprisingly high. The extent of reproduction ranged from 12% to 63%. Conclusion The lack of inventiveness and originality in framing individual-specific thank-you notes often leads students to plagiarize or paraphrase sentences from previous manuscripts. However, this might also reflect the fact that the number of reasonable ways to thank one's thesis supervisor is far smaller than the number of theses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Nonpartisan Education Review is the property of Nonpartisan Education Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 193377390
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: THANK YOU, TEACHER. IN ‘OTHER PEOPLES’ WORDS! A STUDY OF THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SECTIONS.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Nonpartisan+Education+Review%22">Nonpartisan Education Review</searchLink>. 2025, Vol. 21, p2-10. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Plagiarism%22">Plagiarism</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+discourse%22">Academic discourse</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+students%22">Graduate students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+medical+education%22">Graduate medical education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Paraphrase%22">Paraphrase</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22India%22">India</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background Thesis work is an integral part of medical postgraduate education in India. However, despite producing a large number of theses every year, only a tiny percentage of this research makes its way to standard medical journals around the world. One reason for this is the relative lack of novelty, innovation, and imagination in this research. Methods We looked at the acknowledgement sections of 63 medical thesis manuscripts from 4 different colleges. By comparing the acknowledgement passages penned by the researchers, we assessed the extent of plagiarism/ paraphrasing in the sentences and phrases used. Results The extent of plagiarism and paraphrasing was surprisingly high. The extent of reproduction ranged from 12% to 63%. Conclusion The lack of inventiveness and originality in framing individual-specific thank-you notes often leads students to plagiarize or paraphrase sentences from previous manuscripts. However, this might also reflect the fact that the number of reasonable ways to thank one's thesis supervisor is far smaller than the number of theses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Nonpartisan Education Review is the property of Nonpartisan Education Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=193377390
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 2
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Plagiarism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic discourse
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduate students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduate medical education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Paraphrase
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: India
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: THANK YOU, TEACHER. IN ‘OTHER PEOPLES’ WORDS! A STUDY OF THESIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SECTIONS.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 21506477
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 21
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Nonpartisan Education Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1