Evaluation of an interdisciplinary design thinking course.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluation of an interdisciplinary design thinking course. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kumarappan, Manjari1 (AUTHOR), Skywark Connor, Emily1 (AUTHOR), Chen, Elizabeth1 (AUTHOR) lizcchen@unc.edu |
| Source: | Innovations in Education & Teaching International. Jun2026, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p781-796. 16p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Educational evaluation, *Graduate education, *Outcome-based education, *College curriculum, *Health occupations schools, *Mixed methods research, Design thinking, Group problem solving |
| Company/Entity: | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
| Abstract: | As health professions integrate more collaborative problem-solving approaches like design thinking, assessing students in cross-disciplinary, innovation-focused competencies is essential. This mixed-methods study evaluates an interdisciplinary graduate design thinking course at The University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, examining students' progression in key competencies. Surveys administered at the beginning, middle, and end of the semester captured self-reported design thinking expertise from 53 students. Results were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and mixed-effects ordered logistics regression. Student reflections were coded for design thinking methods, mindsets, and competencies. Students demonstrated significant advancement in design thinking expertise, with no demographic subgroup (e.g. by race and ethnicity, degree, school) outperforming another. While competencies like "empathetic" and "inspired" were more easily adopted, those like "confident" and "collaborative" were more challenging. The course effectively advances students' design thinking expertise overall, but refining its structure and classroom experiences can better support key competencies needed for future health professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Innovations in Education & Teaching International is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 193689878 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluation of an interdisciplinary design thinking course. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kumarappan%2C+Manjari%22">Kumarappan, Manjari</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Skywark+Connor%2C+Emily%22">Skywark Connor, Emily</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Elizabeth%22">Chen, Elizabeth</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> lizcchen@unc.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Innovations+in+Education+%26+Teaching+International%22">Innovations in Education & Teaching International</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p781-796. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+evaluation%22">Educational evaluation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+education%22">Graduate education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcome-based+education%22">Outcome-based education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+curriculum%22">College curriculum</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+occupations+schools%22">Health occupations schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+methods+research%22">Mixed methods research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design+thinking%22">Design thinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+problem+solving%22">Group problem solving</searchLink> – Name: SubjectCompany Label: Company/Entity Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+of+North+Carolina+at+Chapel+Hill%22">University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: As health professions integrate more collaborative problem-solving approaches like design thinking, assessing students in cross-disciplinary, innovation-focused competencies is essential. This mixed-methods study evaluates an interdisciplinary graduate design thinking course at The University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, examining students' progression in key competencies. Surveys administered at the beginning, middle, and end of the semester captured self-reported design thinking expertise from 53 students. Results were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and mixed-effects ordered logistics regression. Student reflections were coded for design thinking methods, mindsets, and competencies. Students demonstrated significant advancement in design thinking expertise, with no demographic subgroup (e.g. by race and ethnicity, degree, school) outperforming another. While competencies like "empathetic" and "inspired" were more easily adopted, those like "confident" and "collaborative" were more challenging. The course effectively advances students' design thinking expertise overall, but refining its structure and classroom experiences can better support key competencies needed for future health professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Innovations in Education & Teaching International is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=193689878 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/14703297.2025.2514247 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 781 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate education Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcome-based education Type: general – SubjectFull: College curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Health occupations schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Mixed methods research Type: general – SubjectFull: Design thinking Type: general – SubjectFull: Group problem solving Type: general – SubjectFull: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluation of an interdisciplinary design thinking course. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kumarappan, Manjari – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Skywark Connor, Emily – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chen, Elizabeth IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 14703297 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 63 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Innovations in Education & Teaching International Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |