The Faculty Factor: Key Behaviors Impacting Community College Student Learning.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Faculty Factor: Key Behaviors Impacting Community College Student Learning.
Authors: Lundberg, Carol A.1 (AUTHOR) clundberg@fullerton.edu, Kim, Young K.2 (AUTHOR), Bohlig, E. Michael3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Community College Review. Jul2026, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p219-247. 29p.
Subject Terms: *Effective teaching, *Educational support, *University faculty, *Student development, *Community colleges, *Adjunct faculty, *Academic achievement, *Career development
Abstract: Research Questions: Using a sample of 56,807 community college students and 10,343 faculty from 105 community colleges, this study asked which faculty behaviors were associated with student learning, and if there were differences in those behaviors based on faculty type. Methods: Our two-stage analysis used data from the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and the Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE). We used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to identify faculty practices that predict student learning, with a random-effects ANOVA model and a means-as-outcomes model. After identifying the faculty practices that most strongly predicted learning, we identified differences in frequency of their use based on faculty type. Results: Three of the four strongest indicators of student learning were an emphasis on (a) support to help students succeed, (b) contact among students from different backgrounds, and (c) amount of study time. Talking about career plans with an instructor or advisor predicted career learning, academic learning, and personal development. Full-time faculty, faculty teaching career and technical education, developmental faculty, and faculty who had taught a course more than 20 times used these effective practices more than other faculty. Conclusions: Introducing students to institutional support for their success was the strongest predictor in the model, but part-time faculty, faculty teaching only college-level courses, and faculty with less experience in a course engaged in this behavior less often than their peers. Part-time faculty may need more information about support available to students, and college-level faculty could benefit by emphasizing support services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Community College Review is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 194258050
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Faculty Factor: Key Behaviors Impacting Community College Student Learning.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lundberg%2C+Carol+A%2E%22">Lundberg, Carol A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> clundberg@fullerton.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kim%2C+Young+K%2E%22">Kim, Young K.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bohlig%2C+E%2E+Michael%22">Bohlig, E. Michael</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Community+College+Review%22">Community College Review</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p219-247. 29p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effective+teaching%22">Effective teaching</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+support%22">Educational support</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+faculty%22">University faculty</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+development%22">Student development</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+colleges%22">Community colleges</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adjunct+faculty%22">Adjunct faculty</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+achievement%22">Academic achievement</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Career+development%22">Career development</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Research Questions: Using a sample of 56,807 community college students and 10,343 faculty from 105 community colleges, this study asked which faculty behaviors were associated with student learning, and if there were differences in those behaviors based on faculty type. Methods: Our two-stage analysis used data from the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and the Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE). We used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to identify faculty practices that predict student learning, with a random-effects ANOVA model and a means-as-outcomes model. After identifying the faculty practices that most strongly predicted learning, we identified differences in frequency of their use based on faculty type. Results: Three of the four strongest indicators of student learning were an emphasis on (a) support to help students succeed, (b) contact among students from different backgrounds, and (c) amount of study time. Talking about career plans with an instructor or advisor predicted career learning, academic learning, and personal development. Full-time faculty, faculty teaching career and technical education, developmental faculty, and faculty who had taught a course more than 20 times used these effective practices more than other faculty. Conclusions: Introducing students to institutional support for their success was the strongest predictor in the model, but part-time faculty, faculty teaching only college-level courses, and faculty with less experience in a course engaged in this behavior less often than their peers. Part-time faculty may need more information about support available to students, and college-level faculty could benefit by emphasizing support services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Community College Review is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=194258050
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/00915521261428086
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 29
        StartPage: 219
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Effective teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational support
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: University faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Community colleges
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adjunct faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Career development
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Faculty Factor: Key Behaviors Impacting Community College Student Learning.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lundberg, Carol A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kim, Young K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bohlig, E. Michael
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00915521
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 54
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Community College Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1