Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions.
Saved in:
| Title: | Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi1 (AUTHOR) mabditabari@unr.edu, Sato, Masatoshi2 (AUTHOR), Wang, Yizhou3 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Language Teaching Research. Jul2026, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p2865-2898. 34p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Revision (Writing process), *Protocol analysis (Cognition), *Second language acquisition, *Teaching methods, *English as a foreign language, Psychological techniques |
| Abstract: | This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity–accuracy–lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Language Teaching Research is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 194356910 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tabari%2C+Mahmoud+Abdi%22">Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mabditabari@unr.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sato%2C+Masatoshi%22">Sato, Masatoshi</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Yizhou%22">Wang, Yizhou</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Language+Teaching+Research%22">Language Teaching Research</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p2865-2898. 34p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Writing+process%29%22">Revision (Writing process)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Protocol+analysis+%28Cognition%29%22">Protocol analysis (Cognition)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+language+acquisition%22">Second language acquisition</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+as+a+foreign+language%22">English as a foreign language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+techniques%22">Psychological techniques</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity–accuracy–lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Language Teaching Research is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=194356910 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/13621688231202574 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 StartPage: 2865 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Revision (Writing process) Type: general – SubjectFull: Protocol analysis (Cognition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Second language acquisition Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching methods Type: general – SubjectFull: English as a foreign language Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological techniques Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sato, Masatoshi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Yizhou IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13621688 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Teaching Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |