Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions.
Authors: Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi1 (AUTHOR) mabditabari@unr.edu, Sato, Masatoshi2 (AUTHOR), Wang, Yizhou3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Language Teaching Research. Jul2026, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p2865-2898. 34p.
Subject Terms: *Revision (Writing process), *Protocol analysis (Cognition), *Second language acquisition, *Teaching methods, *English as a foreign language, Psychological techniques
Abstract: This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity–accuracy–lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Language Teaching Research is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 194356910
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tabari%2C+Mahmoud+Abdi%22">Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mabditabari@unr.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sato%2C+Masatoshi%22">Sato, Masatoshi</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Yizhou%22">Wang, Yizhou</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Language+Teaching+Research%22">Language Teaching Research</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p2865-2898. 34p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Writing+process%29%22">Revision (Writing process)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Protocol+analysis+%28Cognition%29%22">Protocol analysis (Cognition)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+language+acquisition%22">Second language acquisition</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+as+a+foreign+language%22">English as a foreign language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+techniques%22">Psychological techniques</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity–accuracy–lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Language Teaching Research is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=194356910
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/13621688231202574
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 34
        StartPage: 2865
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Revision (Writing process)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Protocol analysis (Cognition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second language acquisition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English as a foreign language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychological techniques
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sato, Masatoshi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Yizhou
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 13621688
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Language Teaching Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1