Functional Benefits of Bilateral Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices for Children and Adults With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses.
Saved in:
| Title: | Functional Benefits of Bilateral Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices for Children and Adults With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Gifford, René H.1 rene.gifford@heartsforhearing.org, Davis, Hilary2, Holder, Jourdan3 |
| Source: | American Journal of Audiology. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p734-744. 11p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Academic medical centers, *Data analysis, *Listening, *Longitudinal method, *Speech perception, *Comparative studies, *Children, *Adults, Repeated measures design, Conductive hearing loss, Bone conduction, T-test (Statistics), Speech, Noise, Hearing aids, Visual analog scale, Two-way analysis of variance, Treatment effectiveness, Descriptive statistics, One-way analysis of variance, Statistics, Statistical reliability, Confidence intervals, Data analysis software |
| Abstract: | Purpose: This study aimed to compare performance between unilateral and bilateral bone-conduction hearing device (BCHD) use for speech understanding and subjective listening difficulty. Method: This study involved prospective investigation of bilateral BCHD with human subjects at an academic medical center. Twelve individuals (five children, seven adults) with BCHD were recruited (eight unilateral BCHDs, four bilateral BCHDs). Speech recognition was assessed in colocated noise (Bamford--Kowal--Bench Speech in Noise), diffuse noise (AzBio/BabyBio), and roving speech in diffuse noise (Basic English Lexicon sentences) as well as patient-reported outcomes of listening difficulty and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Results: Statistically significant bilateral BCHD benefit was noted for roving speech. Bilateral BCHDs resulted in speech understanding scores that were not significantly different across speech location, whereas unilateral BCHD revealed significantly poorer performance with speech directed to the unaided ear. However, bilateral BCHD benefit may not be easily quantified in clinical settings, as we observed no significant bilateral benefit for the clinical assessments of speech in colocated noise. Conclusions: Significant bilateral BCHD benefit was noted for roving speech in diffuse noise, similar to group conversations in noisy restaurants. Significant benefits were not observed for a fixed sound source in colocated noise making clinical assessment of the potential benefit of a second BCHD challenging; however, performance in the bilateral BCHD condition was either similar to or better than the best single ear alone thereby consistent with clinical benefits observed in complex noise. Overall, the study provides evidence in support of bilateral BCHD, but further investigation with larger samples is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of American Journal of Audiology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 194359744 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Functional Benefits of Bilateral Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices for Children and Adults With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gifford%2C+René+H%2E%22">Gifford, René H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> rene.gifford@heartsforhearing.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Davis%2C+Hilary%22">Davis, Hilary</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holder%2C+Jourdan%22">Holder, Jourdan</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Audiology%22">American Journal of Audiology</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p734-744. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+medical+centers%22">Academic medical centers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Listening%22">Listening</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech+perception%22">Speech perception</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Repeated+measures+design%22">Repeated measures design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conductive+hearing+loss%22">Conductive hearing loss</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bone+conduction%22">Bone conduction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech%22">Speech</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Noise%22">Noise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+aids%22">Hearing aids</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+analog+scale%22">Visual analog scale</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Two-way+analysis+of+variance%22">Two-way analysis of variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22One-way+analysis+of+variance%22">One-way analysis of variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: This study aimed to compare performance between unilateral and bilateral bone-conduction hearing device (BCHD) use for speech understanding and subjective listening difficulty. Method: This study involved prospective investigation of bilateral BCHD with human subjects at an academic medical center. Twelve individuals (five children, seven adults) with BCHD were recruited (eight unilateral BCHDs, four bilateral BCHDs). Speech recognition was assessed in colocated noise (Bamford--Kowal--Bench Speech in Noise), diffuse noise (AzBio/BabyBio), and roving speech in diffuse noise (Basic English Lexicon sentences) as well as patient-reported outcomes of listening difficulty and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Results: Statistically significant bilateral BCHD benefit was noted for roving speech. Bilateral BCHDs resulted in speech understanding scores that were not significantly different across speech location, whereas unilateral BCHD revealed significantly poorer performance with speech directed to the unaided ear. However, bilateral BCHD benefit may not be easily quantified in clinical settings, as we observed no significant bilateral benefit for the clinical assessments of speech in colocated noise. Conclusions: Significant bilateral BCHD benefit was noted for roving speech in diffuse noise, similar to group conversations in noisy restaurants. Significant benefits were not observed for a fixed sound source in colocated noise making clinical assessment of the potential benefit of a second BCHD challenging; however, performance in the bilateral BCHD condition was either similar to or better than the best single ear alone thereby consistent with clinical benefits observed in complex noise. Overall, the study provides evidence in support of bilateral BCHD, but further investigation with larger samples is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Audiology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=194359744 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00123 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 734 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Academic medical centers Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Listening Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method Type: general – SubjectFull: Speech perception Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Children Type: general – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general – SubjectFull: Repeated measures design Type: general – SubjectFull: Conductive hearing loss Type: general – SubjectFull: Bone conduction Type: general – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics) Type: general – SubjectFull: Speech Type: general – SubjectFull: Noise Type: general – SubjectFull: Hearing aids Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual analog scale Type: general – SubjectFull: Two-way analysis of variance Type: general – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: One-way analysis of variance Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Functional Benefits of Bilateral Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices for Children and Adults With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Losses. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gifford, René H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Davis, Hilary – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Holder, Jourdan IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10590889 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: American Journal of Audiology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |