Translanguaging Practices in Vietnamese EFL and CFL Classrooms: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Translanguaging Practices in Vietnamese EFL and CFL Classrooms: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Study.
Authors: Phung, Thong Nguyen Tri1, Huynh, Huy Gia2
Source: Journal of Language Teaching & Research. Jul2026, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p1221-1231. 11p.
Subject Terms: *Foreign language education, *Mixed methods research, *Teacher education, *Teaching methods, Similarity (Language learning), Multilingual communication, Vietnamese language
Abstract: Translanguaging has emerged as a transformative pedagogical approach in foreign language education, yet comparative research examining how linguistic proximity between L1 and target language shapes translanguaging practices remains scarce. This mixed-method study investigated translanguaging practices employed by Vietnamese university lecturers in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) classrooms using Fang and Liu's (2020) five-dimensional framework: concept explanation, comprehension check, knowledge localization, instruction reinforcement, and rapport building. Data were collected from ten lecturers (five EFL and five CFL) through classroom observations, field notes, audio recordings, and stimulated recall interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed that knowledge localization was the most divergent dimension, with CFL teachers employing this strategy significantly more frequently than EFL teachers. This difference is attributed to the extensive Sino-Vietnamese cognate system, which enables CFL teachers to systematically exploit connections between Chinese and Vietnamese linguistic and cultural resources. In contrast, the remaining four dimensions showed comparable patterns across both contexts, suggesting these functions are driven by universal pedagogical needs rather than language-specific factors. Qualitative findings revealed that while CFL teachers deliberately leveraged linguistic proximity, EFL teachers expressed concerns about localization compromising target language authenticity. These findings extend translanguaging theory by demonstrating that translanguaging dimensions operate differently depending on linguistic proximity and highlight implications for teacher education programs to address monolingual ideologies that may constrain translanguaging practices in EFL contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Language Teaching & Research is the property of Academy Publication Co., LTD and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 195267831
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Translanguaging Practices in Vietnamese EFL and CFL Classrooms: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Phung%2C+Thong+Nguyen+Tri%22">Phung, Thong Nguyen Tri</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huynh%2C+Huy+Gia%22">Huynh, Huy Gia</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Language+Teaching+%26+Research%22">Journal of Language Teaching & Research</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p1221-1231. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+language+education%22">Foreign language education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+methods+research%22">Mixed methods research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+education%22">Teacher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Similarity+%28Language+learning%29%22">Similarity (Language learning)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multilingual+communication%22">Multilingual communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vietnamese+language%22">Vietnamese language</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Translanguaging has emerged as a transformative pedagogical approach in foreign language education, yet comparative research examining how linguistic proximity between L1 and target language shapes translanguaging practices remains scarce. This mixed-method study investigated translanguaging practices employed by Vietnamese university lecturers in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) classrooms using Fang and Liu's (2020) five-dimensional framework: concept explanation, comprehension check, knowledge localization, instruction reinforcement, and rapport building. Data were collected from ten lecturers (five EFL and five CFL) through classroom observations, field notes, audio recordings, and stimulated recall interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed that knowledge localization was the most divergent dimension, with CFL teachers employing this strategy significantly more frequently than EFL teachers. This difference is attributed to the extensive Sino-Vietnamese cognate system, which enables CFL teachers to systematically exploit connections between Chinese and Vietnamese linguistic and cultural resources. In contrast, the remaining four dimensions showed comparable patterns across both contexts, suggesting these functions are driven by universal pedagogical needs rather than language-specific factors. Qualitative findings revealed that while CFL teachers deliberately leveraged linguistic proximity, EFL teachers expressed concerns about localization compromising target language authenticity. These findings extend translanguaging theory by demonstrating that translanguaging dimensions operate differently depending on linguistic proximity and highlight implications for teacher education programs to address monolingual ideologies that may constrain translanguaging practices in EFL contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Language Teaching & Research is the property of Academy Publication Co., LTD and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=195267831
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.17507/jltr.1704.09
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 1221
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Foreign language education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mixed methods research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Similarity (Language learning)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multilingual communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vietnamese language
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Translanguaging Practices in Vietnamese EFL and CFL Classrooms: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Phung, Thong Nguyen Tri
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huynh, Huy Gia
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 17984769
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 17
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Language Teaching & Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1