Proverbs as Argumentative Strategy in Egyptian Arabic: A Sociopragmatic Study.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Proverbs as Argumentative Strategy in Egyptian Arabic: A Sociopragmatic Study.
Authors:	Mahfouz, Adel Refaat¹ adelrefaat56@mu.edu.eg
Source:	Journal of Language Teaching & Research. Sep2026, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p1550-1560. 11p.
Subject Terms:	*Interpersonal communication, Proverbs, Social factors, Speech act theory (Communication), Face-to-face communication, Sociolinguistics, Rhetorical analysis, Arabic language
People:	Searle, John R., 1932-2025
Abstract:	This study examines the argumentative function of proverbs in the daily communication of Egyptians via a sociopragmatic perspective. The proverbs were pragmatically analyzed to reveal their implicature and to evaluate their communicative efficacy as an argumentative strategy. Moreover, the proverbs were socially analyzed to determine whether social variables such as age, gender, education, and place of residence influence their frequency. To conduct this study, fifty-two common proverbs were collected through close observation, note-taking, TV soap operas, films, social media, and the repertoire. Leech’s (1983) Interpersonal Rhetoric Model, Austin’s (1975), and Searle’s (1969, 1976) Speech Act Theory were used to analyze the pragmatic import of each proverb. The study showed that older people, particularly women, villagers, slum dwellers, and laypersons, frequently use proverbs because they are simple, ready-made, and authoritative argumentative strategies. In contrast, youth, highly educated people, and residents of upscale districts rarely use proverbs for social reasons. Although frequent use prevents proverbs and the folklore they represent from fading, it results in a slight communication gap among the various social classes and generations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Language Teaching & Research is the property of Academy Publication Co., LTD and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	This study examines the argumentative function of proverbs in the daily communication of Egyptians via a sociopragmatic perspective. The proverbs were pragmatically analyzed to reveal their implicature and to evaluate their communicative efficacy as an argumentative strategy. Moreover, the proverbs were socially analyzed to determine whether social variables such as age, gender, education, and place of residence influence their frequency. To conduct this study, fifty-two common proverbs were collected through close observation, note-taking, TV soap operas, films, social media, and the repertoire. Leech’s (1983) Interpersonal Rhetoric Model, Austin’s (1975), and Searle’s (1969, 1976) Speech Act Theory were used to analyze the pragmatic import of each proverb. The study showed that older people, particularly women, villagers, slum dwellers, and laypersons, frequently use proverbs because they are simple, ready-made, and authoritative argumentative strategies. In contrast, youth, highly educated people, and residents of upscale districts rarely use proverbs for social reasons. Although frequent use prevents proverbs and the folklore they represent from fading, it results in a slight communication gap among the various social classes and generations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	17984769
DOI:	10.17507/jltr.1705.02