User Perceptions and Metaphorical Framings in Academic Library Discovery Interfaces: A Comparative Study of Primo and Koha.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: User Perceptions and Metaphorical Framings in Academic Library Discovery Interfaces: A Comparative Study of Primo and Koha.
Authors: Jaskowska, Bożena1 (AUTHOR) bozena.jaskowska@uken.krakow.pl
Source: Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 2026, Vol. 64 Issue 5/6, p204-224. 21p.
Subject Terms: *Information storage & retrieval systems, Metaphor, Integrated library systems (Computer systems), User-centered system design, User experience
Abstract: Academic library discovery interfaces increasingly adopt design patterns associated with web search engines and e-commerce platforms. This article examines user perceptions and metaphorical framings in two academic library discovery interfaces, Primo and Koha. Using a heuristic audit, usability testing, and semi-structured interviews, the study investigates how users understand catalog functions and which metaphorical models shape their interaction. The findings indicate that search engine and online-shop framings dominate users' mental models, influencing expectations and strategies even when task performance is limited. Participants often evaluated the interfaces positively despite difficulties with filtering, record interpretation, and specialist bibliographic features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cataloging & Classification Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 197282215
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: User Perceptions and Metaphorical Framings in Academic Library Discovery Interfaces: A Comparative Study of Primo and Koha.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jaskowska%2C+Bożena%22">Jaskowska, Bożena</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> bozena.jaskowska@uken.krakow.pl</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Cataloging+%26+Classification+Quarterly%22">Cataloging & Classification Quarterly</searchLink>. 2026, Vol. 64 Issue 5/6, p204-224. 21p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metaphor%22">Metaphor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrated+library+systems+%28Computer+systems%29%22">Integrated library systems (Computer systems)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User-centered+system+design%22">User-centered system design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User+experience%22">User experience</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Academic library discovery interfaces increasingly adopt design patterns associated with web search engines and e-commerce platforms. This article examines user perceptions and metaphorical framings in two academic library discovery interfaces, Primo and Koha. Using a heuristic audit, usability testing, and semi-structured interviews, the study investigates how users understand catalog functions and which metaphorical models shape their interaction. The findings indicate that search engine and online-shop framings dominate users' mental models, influencing expectations and strategies even when task performance is limited. Participants often evaluated the interfaces positively despite difficulties with filtering, record interpretation, and specialist bibliographic features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Cataloging & Classification Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=197282215
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/01639374.2026.2694978
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 204
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Metaphor
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Integrated library systems (Computer systems)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: User-centered system design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: User experience
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: User Perceptions and Metaphorical Framings in Academic Library Discovery Interfaces: A Comparative Study of Primo and Koha.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jaskowska, Bożena
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: 2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01639374
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 64
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5/6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
              Type: main
ResultId 1