View in EDS

ARGUMENTS AGAINST HOMOGENOUS GROUPING.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: ARGUMENTS AGAINST HOMOGENOUS GROUPING.
Source: Elementary School Journal. May1931, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p646-649. 4p.
Subject Terms: *Ability grouping (Education), *Continuous progress programs, *School superintendents, *School administrators, *Educational programs, *Curriculum
Abstract: The article discusses the arguments of several superintendents of schools against homogeneous grouping. According to several superintendents, this argument is not valid because, when pupils will put in the lower-ability groups, it develops a sense of failure and inferiority. Homogeneous grouping is undemocratic and creates distinctions in the mind of pupils. It also offers no advantage to a school with an activity program and a correlated curriculum.
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 21698305
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: ARGUMENTS AGAINST HOMOGENOUS GROUPING.
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Elementary+School+Journal%22">Elementary School Journal</searchLink>. May1931, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p646-649. 4p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ability+grouping+%28Education%29%22">Ability grouping (Education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Continuous+progress+programs%22">Continuous progress programs</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+superintendents%22">School superintendents</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+administrators%22">School administrators</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+programs%22">Educational programs</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article discusses the arguments of several superintendents of schools against homogeneous grouping. According to several superintendents, this argument is not valid because, when pupils will put in the lower-ability groups, it develops a sense of failure and inferiority. Homogeneous grouping is undemocratic and creates distinctions in the mind of pupils. It also offers no advantage to a school with an activity program and a correlated curriculum.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=21698305
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
        StartPage: 646
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Ability grouping (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Continuous progress programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School superintendents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School administrators
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: ARGUMENTS AGAINST HOMOGENOUS GROUPING.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May1931
              Type: published
              Y: 1931
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00135984
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Elementary School Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1