The Development of Alternative Voice Mechanisms in Australia: The Case of Joint Consultation.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Development of Alternative Voice Mechanisms in Australia: The Case of Joint Consultation. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Holland, Peter1, Pyman, Amanda2, Cooper, Brian K.1, Teicher, Julian1 |
| Source: | Economic & Industrial Democracy. Feb2009, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p67-92. 26p. |
| Subject Terms: | Personnel management, Supervision of employees, Management, Resource management, Employment tests, Employee participation in industrial management, Employee participation in management, Industrial relations |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia |
| Abstract: | The Australian industrial relations landscape has changed significantly. An increasingly hostile political environment and the emergence of human resource management (HRM) have seen the role of union voice decline significantly. Drawing on responses from the 2004 Australian Worker Representation and Participation Survey (AWRPS), this article examines the incidence and predictors of joint consultation, and employees' perceptions of the effectiveness of joint consultation. The study finds that joint consultation is a popular feature of the workplace. Joint consultation was highest in unionized workplaces, and the presence of a union and favourable management attitudes to unions are statistically significant predictors of joint consultative committees (JCC). Employees also report JCCs to be highly effective. The article concludes that joint consultation, as an alternative mechanism in Australian workplaces, is viewed as an effective form of voice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Economic & Industrial Democracy is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 36399589 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Development of Alternative Voice Mechanisms in Australia: The Case of Joint Consultation. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holland%2C+Peter%22">Holland, Peter</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pyman%2C+Amanda%22">Pyman, Amanda</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooper%2C+Brian+K%2E%22">Cooper, Brian K.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Teicher%2C+Julian%22">Teicher, Julian</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Economic+%26+Industrial+Democracy%22">Economic & Industrial Democracy</searchLink>. Feb2009, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p67-92. 26p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personnel+management%22">Personnel management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supervision+of+employees%22">Supervision of employees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Management%22">Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Resource+management%22">Resource management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+tests%22">Employment tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+participation+in+industrial+management%22">Employee participation in industrial management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+participation+in+management%22">Employee participation in management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Industrial+relations%22">Industrial relations</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The Australian industrial relations landscape has changed significantly. An increasingly hostile political environment and the emergence of human resource management (HRM) have seen the role of union voice decline significantly. Drawing on responses from the 2004 Australian Worker Representation and Participation Survey (AWRPS), this article examines the incidence and predictors of joint consultation, and employees' perceptions of the effectiveness of joint consultation. The study finds that joint consultation is a popular feature of the workplace. Joint consultation was highest in unionized workplaces, and the presence of a union and favourable management attitudes to unions are statistically significant predictors of joint consultative committees (JCC). Employees also report JCCs to be highly effective. The article concludes that joint consultation, as an alternative mechanism in Australian workplaces, is viewed as an effective form of voice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Economic & Industrial Democracy is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=36399589 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/0143831X08099434 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 StartPage: 67 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Personnel management Type: general – SubjectFull: Supervision of employees Type: general – SubjectFull: Management Type: general – SubjectFull: Resource management Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee participation in industrial management Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee participation in management Type: general – SubjectFull: Industrial relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Development of Alternative Voice Mechanisms in Australia: The Case of Joint Consultation. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Holland, Peter – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pyman, Amanda – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cooper, Brian K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Teicher, Julian IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Text: Feb2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0143831X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Economic & Industrial Democracy Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |