An Opposing Process Model of Benevolent Sexism.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An Opposing Process Model of Benevolent Sexism.
Authors: Sibley, Chris1 c.sibley@auckland.ac.nz, Perry, Ryan1
Source: Sex Roles. Apr2010, Vol. 62 Issue 7-8, p438-452. 15p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject Terms: *Employment discrimination, *Individual differences, Sexism, Social policy, Pay equity
Geographic Terms: New Zealand
Abstract: An Opposing Process Model outlining the pathways through which individual differences in Benevolent Sexism (BS) simultaneously enhance and attenuate support for gender equality of income and employment opportunity is presented. Results from a New Zealand electoral sample ( N = 336) indicated that BS predicted Hostile Sexism (HS), and thus indirectly opposition toward gender-related policies (a hierarchy-enhancing effect). For women, BS also directly predicted attitudes toward gender equality in the opposing, supportive direction (a hierarchy-attenuating effect). Analyses of a 9-month longitudinal sample of undergraduate women substantiated these results (Study II; N = 170). In stable societies, the dual opposing effects of BS seem to form a system where hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating processes tend toward homeostasis or equilibrium within the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Sex Roles is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 50377664
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An Opposing Process Model of Benevolent Sexism.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sibley%2C+Chris%22">Sibley, Chris</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> c.sibley@auckland.ac.nz</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Perry%2C+Ryan%22">Perry, Ryan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Sex+Roles%22">Sex Roles</searchLink>. Apr2010, Vol. 62 Issue 7-8, p438-452. 15p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment+discrimination%22">Employment discrimination</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+differences%22">Individual differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sexism%22">Sexism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+policy%22">Social policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pay+equity%22">Pay equity</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+Zealand%22">New Zealand</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: An Opposing Process Model outlining the pathways through which individual differences in Benevolent Sexism (BS) simultaneously enhance and attenuate support for gender equality of income and employment opportunity is presented. Results from a New Zealand electoral sample ( N = 336) indicated that BS predicted Hostile Sexism (HS), and thus indirectly opposition toward gender-related policies (a hierarchy-enhancing effect). For women, BS also directly predicted attitudes toward gender equality in the opposing, supportive direction (a hierarchy-attenuating effect). Analyses of a 9-month longitudinal sample of undergraduate women substantiated these results (Study II; N = 170). In stable societies, the dual opposing effects of BS seem to form a system where hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating processes tend toward homeostasis or equilibrium within the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Sex Roles is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=50377664
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11199-009-9705-6
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 438
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Employment discrimination
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individual differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sexism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pay equity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: New Zealand
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An Opposing Process Model of Benevolent Sexism.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sibley, Chris
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Perry, Ryan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2010
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03600025
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 62
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7-8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Sex Roles
              Type: main
ResultId 1