Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16.
Saved in:
| Title: | Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Harris, Janet1,2 (AUTHOR) janet.harris@sheffield.ac.uk, Kearley, Karen3,4 (AUTHOR), Heneghan, Carl3,5 (AUTHOR), Meats, Emma3 (AUTHOR), Roberts, Nia3,6 (AUTHOR), Perera, Rafael3,7 (AUTHOR), Kearley-Shiers, Katharine8,9 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Jan2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p9-23. 15p. 1 Diagram, 7 Charts, 2 Graphs. |
| Subject Terms: | *Clinical competence, *Content analysis, *Journal writing, *Medical students, *Reading, *Teaching methods, *Educational outcomes, Study & teaching of medicine, Professions, Systematic reviews, Evidence-based medicine |
| Abstract: | Background: Journal clubs (JCs) are a common form of interactive education in health care aiming to promote the uptake of research evidence into practice, but their effectiveness has not been established. Objective: This systematic review aimed to determine whether the JC is an effective intervention in supporting clinical decision making. Methods: We searched for studies which evaluated whether clubs promote changes in learner reaction, attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviour or patient outcomes. We included undergraduate, postgraduate and practice JCs and excluded studies evaluating video/internet meetings or single meetings. Results: Eighteen studies were included. Studies reported improvements in reading behaviour ( N = 5/11), confidence in critical appraisal ( N = 7/7), critical appraisal test scores ( N = 5/7) and ability to use findings ( N = 5/7). No studies reported on patient outcomes. Sixteen studies used self-reported measures, but only four studies used validated tests. Interventions were too heterogeneous to allow pooling. Realist synthesis identified potentially 'active educational ingredients', including mentoring, brief training in clinical epidemiology, structured critical appraisal tools, adult-learning principles, multifaceted teaching approaches and integration of the JC with other clinical and academic activities. Conclusion: The effectiveness of JCs in supporting evidence-based decision making is not clear. Better reporting of the intervention and a mixed methods approach to evaluating active ingredients are needed in order to understand how JCs may support evidence-based practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 56594290 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Harris%2C+Janet%22">Harris, Janet</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> janet.harris@sheffield.ac.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kearley%2C+Karen%22">Kearley, Karen</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heneghan%2C+Carl%22">Heneghan, Carl</searchLink><relatesTo>3,5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meats%2C+Emma%22">Meats, Emma</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roberts%2C+Nia%22">Roberts, Nia</searchLink><relatesTo>3,6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Perera%2C+Rafael%22">Perera, Rafael</searchLink><relatesTo>3,7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kearley-Shiers%2C+Katharine%22">Kearley-Shiers, Katharine</searchLink><relatesTo>8,9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Jan2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p9-23. 15p. 1 Diagram, 7 Charts, 2 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+competence%22">Clinical competence</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+analysis%22">Content analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Journal+writing%22">Journal writing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+students%22">Medical students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading%22">Reading</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+outcomes%22">Educational outcomes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Study+%26+teaching+of+medicine%22">Study & teaching of medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professions%22">Professions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence-based+medicine%22">Evidence-based medicine</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Journal clubs (JCs) are a common form of interactive education in health care aiming to promote the uptake of research evidence into practice, but their effectiveness has not been established. Objective: This systematic review aimed to determine whether the JC is an effective intervention in supporting clinical decision making. Methods: We searched for studies which evaluated whether clubs promote changes in learner reaction, attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviour or patient outcomes. We included undergraduate, postgraduate and practice JCs and excluded studies evaluating video/internet meetings or single meetings. Results: Eighteen studies were included. Studies reported improvements in reading behaviour ( N = 5/11), confidence in critical appraisal ( N = 7/7), critical appraisal test scores ( N = 5/7) and ability to use findings ( N = 5/7). No studies reported on patient outcomes. Sixteen studies used self-reported measures, but only four studies used validated tests. Interventions were too heterogeneous to allow pooling. Realist synthesis identified potentially 'active educational ingredients', including mentoring, brief training in clinical epidemiology, structured critical appraisal tools, adult-learning principles, multifaceted teaching approaches and integration of the JC with other clinical and academic activities. Conclusion: The effectiveness of JCs in supporting evidence-based decision making is not clear. Better reporting of the intervention and a mixed methods approach to evaluating active ingredients are needed in order to understand how JCs may support evidence-based practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=56594290 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.530321 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 9 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Clinical competence Type: general – SubjectFull: Content analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Journal writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical students Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational outcomes Type: general – SubjectFull: Study & teaching of medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Professions Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence-based medicine Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Harris, Janet – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kearley, Karen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Heneghan, Carl – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Meats, Emma – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Roberts, Nia – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Perera, Rafael – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kearley-Shiers, Katharine IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: Jan2011 Type: published Y: 2011 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0142159X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 33 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Teacher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |